| dbo:abstract
|
- The open-fields doctrine (also open-field doctrine or open-fields rule), in the U.S. law of criminal procedure, is the legal doctrine that a "warrantless search of the area outside a property owner's curtilage" does not violate the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. However, "unless there is some other legal basis for the search," such a search "must exclude the home and any adjoining land (such as a yard) that is within an enclosure or otherwise protected from public scrutiny." (en)
|
| dbo:thumbnail
| |
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 67961 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
|
- dbr:Bench_trial
- dbr:Preston,_New_York
- dbr:Property
- dbr:Scott_Lake_(Washington)
- dbr:En_banc
- dbr:North_Western_Reporter
- dbr:Montana_inferior_courts
- dbr:Washington_State_Constitution
- dbr:Boulder,_Montana
- dbr:Boyd_v._United_States
- dbr:Dave_Craig
- dbr:Patience_D._Roggensack
- dbr:Right_of_self-defense
- dbr:Right_to_keep_and_bear_arms
- dbr:Curtilage
- dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Western_District_of_Wisconsin
- dbr:United_States_v._Burton
- dbr:United_States_v._Pace
- dbr:Vermont
- dbr:Vermont_Supreme_Court
- dbr:Deer_hunting
- dbr:Game_warden
- dbr:Coos_County,_Oregon
- dbr:Chenango_County,_New_York
- dbr:Non_sequitur_(fallacy)
- dbr:Elk
- dbr:George_Van_Hoomissen
- dbr:Boundary_(real_estate)
- dbr:Montana
- dbr:Montana_Supreme_Court
- dbr:Concurring_opinion
- dbr:Constitution_of_Montana
- dbr:Constitution_of_Oregon
- dbr:Constitution_of_Vermont
- dbr:Criminal_procedure
- dbr:Lafayette_County,_Wisconsin
- dbr:Ann_Walsh_Bradley
- dbr:Annette_Ziegler
- dbr:Lincoln,_Vermont
- dbr:Louis_P._Peck
- dbr:Shirley_Abrahamson
- dbr:Sierra_Club
- dbr:Commentaries_on_the_Laws_of_England
- dbr:Common_law
- dbr:Hot_pursuit
- dbr:Plurality_opinion
- dbr:Poaching
- dbr:Standing_(law)
- dbr:Burglary
- dbr:Addison_County,_Vermont
- dbr:Thurgood_Marshall
- dbr:Thurston_County,_Washington
- dbr:Tree_stand
- dbr:Trial_de_novo
- dbr:U.S._Forest_Service
- dbr:U.S._Supreme_Court
- dbr:W._Michael_Gillette
- dbr:Washington_(state)
- dbr:William_Blackstone
- dbr:William_Pitt,_1st_Earl_of_Chatham
- dbr:Wiretap
- dbr:Wisconsin
- dbr:Wisconsin_Court_of_Appeals
- dbr:Wisconsin_Department_of_Natural_Resources
- dbr:Wisconsin_Highway_81
- dbr:Wisconsin_State_Assembly
- dbr:Wisconsin_State_Senate
- dbr:Wisconsin_Supreme_Court
- dbr:Dissenting_opinion
- dbr:Ipse_dixit
- dbr:James_L._Morse
- dbr:Adam_Jarchow
- dbr:American_Revolution
- dbr:Daniel_Kelly_(Wisconsin_judge)
- dbr:Drug_Enforcement_Administration
- dbr:Expectation_of_privacy
- dbr:Field_dressing_(hunting)
- dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
- dbr:Dictum
- dbr:Judicial_activism
- dbr:Legal_doctrine
- dbr:Legal_immunity
- dbr:Washington_Court_of_Appeals
- dbr:Wildlife_conservation
- dbr:Montana_Department_of_Fish,_Wildlife_and_Parks
- dbr:Remand_(court_procedure)
- dbc:Privacy_law_in_the_United_States
- dbr:Helena,_Montana
- dbr:Hester_v._United_States
- dbr:Atlantic_Reporter
- dbr:Jefferson_County,_Montana
- dbr:Terry_stop
- dbr:Textualism
- dbc:Legal_doctrines_and_principles
- dbc:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law
- dbr:Katz_v._United_States
- dbr:League_of_Conservation_Voters
- dbr:Syllogism
- dbr:Holding_(law)
- dbr:Burden_of_proof_(law)
- dbr:Kyllo_v._United_States
- dbr:Michael_Gableman
- dbr:Millersylvania_State_Park
- dbr:New_Hampshire_Supreme_Court
- dbr:New_Jersey
- dbr:New_York_(state)
- dbr:New_York_Constitution
- dbr:New_York_Court_of_Appeals
- dbr:New_York_State_Police
- dbr:New_York_Supreme_Court,_Appellate_Division
- dbr:Oliver_Wendell_Holmes_Jr.
- dbr:Oliver_v._United_States
- dbr:Olmstead_v._United_States
- dbr:Oregon
- dbr:Oregon_Court_of_Appeals
- dbr:Oregon_Supreme_Court
- dbr:Cannabis_in_Oregon
- dbr:Case_law
- dbr:Rebecca_Bradley_(judge)
- dbr:Search_warrant
- dbr:Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
- dbr:Probable_cause
- dbr:United_States_v._Salvucci
- dbr:In_camera
- dbr:Time_served
- dbr:New_Jersey_Supreme_Court
- dbr:Washington_Supreme_Court
- dbr:Pacific_Reporter
- dbr:Terry_N._Trieweiler
- dbr:Dual_sovereignty
- dbr:Warrantless_search
- dbr:Civil_twilight
- dbr:Blaze_orange
- dbr:Silver_platter_doctrine
- dbr:Per_curiam
- dbr:Evidentiary_hearing
- dbr:Jury_instruction
- dbr:Prejudice_(law)
- dbr:Thermal_imaging_device
- dbr:U.S._law
- dbr:United_States_v._Reilly
- dbr:File:U.S._30_in_Center_Township.jpg
- dbr:Husband_v._Bryan
- dbr:United_States_v._Benish
- dbr:United_States_v._Brady
- dbr:United_States_v._Depew
- dbr:United_States_v._McKeever
- dbr:Wikisource:Oregon_Constitution/Article_I
- dbr:Wikisource:Washington_State_Constitution
|
| dbp:appealedFrom
| |
| dbp:appealedTo
| |
| dbp:citations
| |
| dbp:concurring
|
- Kaye (en)
- Springer (en)
- Bradley, Kelly, Roggensack (en)
|
| dbp:court
| |
| dbp:dateDecided
|
- 1988-12-20 (xsd:date)
- 1991-01-25 (xsd:date)
- 1992-04-02 (xsd:date)
- 1994-09-07 (xsd:date)
- 1995-08-04 (xsd:date)
- 2017-06-13 (xsd:date)
|
| dbp:decisionBy
| |
| dbp:dissenting
|
- Peck (en)
- Bellacosa (en)
- Ziegler, Gableman (en)
|
| dbp:fullName
|
- People of the State of New York v. Guy Scott (en)
- State v. Robert Joseph Stietz (en)
- State of Oregon v. Theresa Dixson, Jeffrey Digby and Lorin Lou Dixson (en)
- State of Washington v. Tamara Sue Johnson and James Raymond Johnson (en)
- State of Montana v. Bill Bullock and Eddie Peterson (en)
|
| dbp:italicTitle
| |
| dbp:judges
|
- 7 (xsd:integer)
- Abrahamson, Grassl Bradley, Kelly, Roggensack, Ziegler, Gableman (en)
- Alexander, Morgan and Houghton (en)
- Allen, Peck, Dooley, Morse, Springer (en)
- Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Bellacosa, Wachtler, Simone (en)
- Trieweiler, Turnage, Nelson, Gray, Hunt, Weber and Leaphart (en)
|
| dbp:keywords
|
- (en)
- search (en)
- Search (en)
- Seizure (en)
- trespass (en)
- seizure (en)
- self-defense (en)
|
| dbp:name
|
- People v. Scott (en)
- State v. Bullock (en)
- State v. Dixson (en)
- State v. Johnson (en)
- State v. Kirchoff (en)
- State v. Stietz (en)
|
| dbp:numberOfJudges
|
- 3 (xsd:integer)
- 6 (xsd:integer)
- 7 (xsd:integer)
|
| dbp:opinions
|
- Alexander (en)
- Trial court erred in not permitting self-defense jury instruction in prosecution of farmer for armed confrontation with DNR game wardens on his property where they could not and did not clearly identify themselves as wardens and could have been seen by him as trespassers. Appeals court reversed and remanded (en)
- Trieweiler (en)
|
| dbp:priorActions
|
- 17280.0
- Criminal trial (en)
- criminal trial (en)
- criminal trial and appeal (en)
|
| dbp:subsequentActions
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| gold:hypernym
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- The open-fields doctrine (also open-field doctrine or open-fields rule), in the U.S. law of criminal procedure, is the legal doctrine that a "warrantless search of the area outside a property owner's curtilage" does not violate the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. However, "unless there is some other legal basis for the search," such a search "must exclude the home and any adjoining land (such as a yard) that is within an enclosure or otherwise protected from public scrutiny." (en)
|
| rdfs:label
|
- Open-fields doctrine (en)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:depiction
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is dbp:keywords
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
