| dbo:abstract
|
- Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928), was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, on the matter of whether wiretapping of private telephone conversations, obtained by federal agents without a search warrant and subsequently used as evidence, constituted a violation of the target’s rights under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments. In a 5–4 decision, the Court held that the Constitutional rights of a wiretapping target have not been violated. This decision was overturned by Katz v. United States in 1967. (en)
|
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 15019 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:arguedatea
|
- 0001-02-20 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:arguedateb
| |
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:case
|
- Olmstead v. United States, (en)
|
| dbp:concurrence/dissent
| |
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-06-04 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:dissent
|
- Stone (en)
- Butler (en)
- Brandeis (en)
|
| dbp:fullname
|
- Olmstead et al. v. United States; Green et al. v. United States; McInnis v. United States. (en)
|
| dbp:holding
|
- The Fourth Amendment's proscription on unreasonable search and seizure did not apply to telephone wiretaps. (en)
|
| dbp:joinmajority
|
- McReynolds, Sanford, Sutherland, Van Devanter (en)
|
| dbp:justia
| |
| dbp:lawsapplied
| |
| dbp:litigants
|
- Olmstead v. United States (en)
|
| dbp:loc
| |
| dbp:majority
| |
| dbp:overruled
|
- Katz v. United States, (en)
|
| dbp:oyez
| |
| dbp:parallelcitations
| |
| dbp:prior
| |
| dbp:subsequent
| |
| dbp:uspage
| |
| dbp:usvol
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928), was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, on the matter of whether wiretapping of private telephone conversations, obtained by federal agents without a search warrant and subsequently used as evidence, constituted a violation of the target’s rights under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments. In a 5–4 decision, the Court held that the Constitutional rights of a wiretapping target have not been violated. This decision was overturned by Katz v. United States in 1967. (en)
|
| rdfs:label
|
- Olmstead v. United States (en)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Olmstead et al. v. United States; Green et al. v. United States; McInnis v. United States. (en)
|
| is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
