This HTML5 document contains 55 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n17https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n8http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/it-security/so-you-want-to-be-a-computer-forensics-expert/
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n13http://www.infolaw.co.uk/newsletter/category/electronic-evidence/
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n9http://ials.sas.ac.uk/publish/deeslr/
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Gates_Rubber_Company_v._Bando_Chemical_Industries,_Ltd.,_et_al
rdfs:label
Gates Rubber Company v. Bando Chemical Industries, Ltd., et al
rdfs:comment
Gates Rubber Company v. Bando Chemical Industries, Ltd., et al. is a decision by the U.S. district court for the District of Colorado from May 1, 1996. It is considered a landmark decision in terms of expert witness court testimony in questions of electronic evidence and digital forensics.
dcterms:subject
dbc:1996_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_evidence_case_law dbc:Digital_forensics
dbo:wikiPageID
45574874
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1097155661
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Algorithm dbr:Hard_drive dbr:E-discovery dbc:Digital_forensics dbr:Best_practise dbr:Hash_function dbr:Computer_hardware dbr:Copyright_infringement dbr:Computer_forensics dbr:Discovery_(law) dbr:Proprietary_software dbr:Disk_mirroring dbr:Disk_image dbr:Litigation dbr:Installation_(computer_programs) dbr:Digital_forensics dbr:Regulatory_compliance dbr:Unfair_competition dbr:Forensic_science dbc:1996_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Software dbr:Lorraine_v._Markel_American_Insurance_Co. dbr:Expert_witness dbr:Due_diligence dbr:Trade_secrets dbr:Computer_program dbr:Electronic_evidence dbr:Intellectual_property dbr:Digital_data dbr:Spoliation_of_evidence dbr:Write_protection dbc:United_States_evidence_case_law dbr:Breach_of_contract dbr:Information_technology dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_District_of_Colorado
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n8: n9:deeslr.htm n13:
owl:sameAs
wikidata:Q20717395 freebase:m.012zbr_j n17:xyR4
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Italic_title dbt:Orphan dbt:Reflist
dbo:abstract
Gates Rubber Company v. Bando Chemical Industries, Ltd., et al. is a decision by the U.S. district court for the District of Colorado from May 1, 1996. It is considered a landmark decision in terms of expert witness court testimony in questions of electronic evidence and digital forensics. In a nutshell, the decision states that the authenticity of electronic evidence is accepted by courts only if the party adducing the evidence complied with the newest technical standards of electronic evidence acquisition. Moreover, U.S. magistrate judge Schlatter commented on the factors he considered relevant in the process of weighing the qualifications of digital forensics experts when those present contrary opinions or conclusions to the court. Hence, Gates v Bando has set legal standards for examining electronic evidence that have remained relevant to this day.
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Gates_Rubber_Company_v._Bando_Chemical_Industries,_Ltd.,_et_al?oldid=1097155661&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
21003
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Gates_Rubber_Company_v._Bando_Chemical_Industries,_Ltd.,_et_al