An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

United States v. Knotts, 460 U.S. 276 (1983), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the use of an electronic surveillance device. The defendants argued that the use of this device was a Fourth Amendment violation. The device in question was described as a beeper that could only be tracked from a short distance. During a single trip, officers followed a car containing the beeper, relying on beeper signal to determine the car's final destination. The Court unanimously held that since the use of such a device did not violate a legitimate expectation of privacy there was no search and seizure and thus the use was allowed without a warrant. It reasoned that a person traveling in public has no expectation of privacy in one's movements. Since there was no search and seizure there was n

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • United States v. Knotts, 460 U.S. 276 (1983), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the use of an electronic surveillance device. The defendants argued that the use of this device was a Fourth Amendment violation. The device in question was described as a beeper that could only be tracked from a short distance. During a single trip, officers followed a car containing the beeper, relying on beeper signal to determine the car's final destination. The Court unanimously held that since the use of such a device did not violate a legitimate expectation of privacy there was no search and seizure and thus the use was allowed without a warrant. It reasoned that a person traveling in public has no expectation of privacy in one's movements. Since there was no search and seizure there was not a Fourth Amendment violation. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 31740492 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 6657 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1014659913 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-12-06 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1982 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • United States v. Knotts, (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Stevens (en)
  • Brennan (en)
  • Blackmun (en)
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-03-02 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1983 (xsd:integer)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • United States v. Knotts (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:holding
  • A radio transmitter may be used without a warrant to aid the police in their physical pursuit of a suspect. (en)
dbp:joinconcurrence
  • Marshall (en)
  • Brennan, Marshall (en)
  • Brennan, Marshall, Stevens (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Burger, White, Powell, O'Connor (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • United States v. Knotts (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Rehnquist (en)
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:prior
  • 17280.0
dbp:uspage
  • 276 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 460 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • United States v. Knotts, 460 U.S. 276 (1983), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the use of an electronic surveillance device. The defendants argued that the use of this device was a Fourth Amendment violation. The device in question was described as a beeper that could only be tracked from a short distance. During a single trip, officers followed a car containing the beeper, relying on beeper signal to determine the car's final destination. The Court unanimously held that since the use of such a device did not violate a legitimate expectation of privacy there was no search and seizure and thus the use was allowed without a warrant. It reasoned that a person traveling in public has no expectation of privacy in one's movements. Since there was no search and seizure there was n (en)
rdfs:label
  • United States v. Knotts (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • United States v. Knotts (en)
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License