An Entity of Type: Abstraction100002137, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

In statistics, the Neyman–Pearson lemma was introduced by Jerzy Neyman and Egon Pearson in a paper in 1933. The Neyman-Pearson lemma is part of the Neyman-Pearson theory of statistical testing, which introduced concepts like errors of the second kind, power function, and inductive behavior. The previous Fisherian theory of significance testing postulated only one hypothesis. By introducing a competing hypothesis, the Neyman-Pearsonian flavor of statistical testing allows investigating the two types of errors. The trivial cases where one always rejects or accepts the null hypothesis are of little interest but it does prove that one must not relinquish control over one type of error while calibrating the other. Neyman and Pearson accordingly proceeded to restrict their attention to the class

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • En estadística, el lema fonamental de Neyman-Pearson és un resultat que descriu el criteri òptim per distingir dues hipòtesis simples H0: θ=θ0 i H1: θ=θ1. (ca)
  • Das Neyman-Pearson-Lemma, auch Fundamentallemma von Neyman-Pearson oder Fundamentallemma der mathematischen Statistik genannt, ist ein zentraler Satz der Testtheorie und somit auch der mathematischen Statistik, der eine Optimalitätsaussage über die Konstruktion eines Hypothesentests macht. Gegenstand des Neyman-Pearson-Lemmas ist das denkbar einfachste Szenario eines Hypothesentests, das auch Neyman-Pearson-Test genannt wird: Dabei ist sowohl die Nullhypothese als auch die Alternativhypothese einfach, d. h., sie entsprechen jeweils einer einzelnen Wahrscheinlichkeitsverteilung, deren zugehörige Wahrscheinlichkeitsdichten nachfolgend mit und bezeichnet werden. Dann, so die Aussage des Neyman-Pearson-Lemmas, erhält man den besten Test durch eine Entscheidung, bei der die Nullhypothese verworfen wird, wenn der Likelihood-Quotient einen bestimmten Wert unterschreitet. Das Lemma ist nach Jerzy Neyman und Egon Pearson benannt, die es 1933 bewiesen haben. (de)
  • En statistique, selon le lemme de Neyman-Pearson, lorsque l'on veut effectuer un test d'hypothèse entre deux hypothèses H0 : θ = θ0 et H1 : θ = θ1, pour un échantillon , alors le test du rapport de vraisemblance, qui rejette H0 en faveur de H1 lorsque , où est tel que , est le test le plus puissant de niveau . Ce lemme est nommé d'après Jerzy Neyman et Egon Sharpe Pearson dans un papier de 1931. En pratique, la plupart du temps, le rapport de vraisemblance lui-même n'est pas explicitement utilisé dans le test. En effet, le test du rapport de vraisemblance ci-dessus est souvent équivalent à un test de la forme pour une statistique plus simple, et le test est effectué sous cette forme-ci. (fr)
  • En estadística, el lema fundamental de Neyman-Pearson es un resultado que describe el criterio óptimo para distinguir dos hipótesis simples y . El lema debe su nombre a sus dos creadores, Jerzy Neyman y Egon Pearson. (es)
  • In statistics, the Neyman–Pearson lemma was introduced by Jerzy Neyman and Egon Pearson in a paper in 1933. The Neyman-Pearson lemma is part of the Neyman-Pearson theory of statistical testing, which introduced concepts like errors of the second kind, power function, and inductive behavior. The previous Fisherian theory of significance testing postulated only one hypothesis. By introducing a competing hypothesis, the Neyman-Pearsonian flavor of statistical testing allows investigating the two types of errors. The trivial cases where one always rejects or accepts the null hypothesis are of little interest but it does prove that one must not relinquish control over one type of error while calibrating the other. Neyman and Pearson accordingly proceeded to restrict their attention to the class of all level tests while subsequently minimizing type II error, traditionally denoted by . Their seminal paper of 1933, including the Neyman-Pearson lemma, comes at the end of this endeavor, not only showing the existence of tests with the most power that retain a prespecified level of type I error, but also providing a way to construct such tests. The Karlin-Rubin theorem extends the Neyman-Pearson lemma to settings involving composite hypotheses with monotone likelihood ratios. (en)
  • ネイマン・ピアソンの補題(ネイマン・ピアソンのほだい)とは、統計学的仮説検定に関する補題。 2つの仮説H0: θ=θ0  と H1: θ=θ1 の間で仮説検定を行う際に、H1を支持しH0を排除するような、次に示す尤度比による尤度比検定: (ただしここで とする)が、サイズ(危険率、第一種過誤) の仮説検定の中で最もパワー(検出力)が大きい、というものである(は第二種過誤)。、が単純仮説であればとなる。 「αを決めておき、その中で検出力が最も大きい検定法を選択する」という方針をネイマン・ピアソンの基準という。この補題はその方法を具体的に与えるものである。ただしこの尤度比検定法が直接用いられるよりも、近似が用いられることが多い。 (ja)
  • In statistica, il lemma fondamentale di Neyman-Pearson asserisce che, quando si opera un test d'ipotesi tra due ipotesi semplici H0: θ=θ0 e H1: θ=θ1, il rapporto delle funzioni di verosomiglianza che rigetta in favore di quando rappresenta il test di verifica più potente a livello di significatività α per una soglia k. Se il test è il più potente per tutti i , si dice che è quello uniformemente più potente (in inglese UMP) tra le alternative del set. Il lemma deve questo nome ai suoi formulatori, Jerzy Neyman e Egon Pearson. (it)
  • Lemat Neymana-Pearsona – twierdzenie z obszaru statystyki opublikowane przez Jerzego Neymana i Egona Pearsona w 1933. Stanowi – w amalgamacie z wcześniejszą propozycją Ronalda Fishera – jedną z podstaw procedury weryfikacji hipotez w podejściu częstościowym. (pl)
  • Em estatística, o método ou lema de Neyman–Pearson foi introduzido pelo matemático polonês Jerzy Neyman e pelo matemático britânico Egon Pearson em um artigo de 1933. Este lema afirma que, quando se realiza um teste de hipóteses entre duas hipóteses simples e , o teste de razão de verossimilhança que rejeita em favor de quando em que é o teste mais potente ao nível de significância para o limiar . Se o teste for o mais potente para todo , pode ser considerado o uniformemente mais potente (UMP) para alternativas no conjunto . Na prática, a razão de verossimilhança é com frequência usada diretamente para construir testes — como o teste de razão de verossimilhança. Entretanto, pode ser usada para sugerir estatísticas de teste particulares que podem ser de interesse ou sugerir testes simplificados — para isto, considera-se a manipulação algébrica da razão para ver se há nela estatísticas-chave relacionadas com o tamanho da razão, isto é, se uma estatística grande corresponde a uma razão pequena ou a uma razão grande. (pt)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 685158 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 13335 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1124888322 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:drop
  • hidden (en)
dbp:mathStatement
  • Existence: If a hypothesis test satisfies condition, then it is a uniformly most powerful test in the set of level tests. Uniqueness: If there exists a hypothesis test that satisfies condition, with , then every UMP test in the set of level tests satisfies condition with the same . Further, the test and the test agree with probability whether or . (en)
dbp:name
  • Neyman-Pearson lemma (en)
dbp:proof
  • Given any hypothesis test with rejection set , define its statistical power function . Existence: Given some hypothesis test that satisfies condition, call its rejection region . For any level hypothesis test with rejection region we have except on some ignorable set . Then integrate it over to obtain . Since and , we find that . Thus the rejection test is a UMP test in the set of level tests. Uniqueness: For any other UMP level test, with rejection region , we have from Existence part, . Since the test is UMP, the left side must be zero. Since the right side gives , so the test has size . Since the integrand is nonnegative, and integrates to zero, it must be exactly zero except on some ignorable set . Since the test satisfies condition, let the ignorable set in the definition of condition be . is ignorable, since for all , we have . Similarly, is ignorable. Define . It is the union of three ignorable sets, thus it is an ignorable set. Then we have and . So the rejection test satisfies condition with the same . Since is ignorable, its subset is also ignorable. Consequently, the two tests agree with probability whether or . (en)
dbp:title
  • Proof (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dct:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • En estadística, el lema fonamental de Neyman-Pearson és un resultat que descriu el criteri òptim per distingir dues hipòtesis simples H0: θ=θ0 i H1: θ=θ1. (ca)
  • En estadística, el lema fundamental de Neyman-Pearson es un resultado que describe el criterio óptimo para distinguir dos hipótesis simples y . El lema debe su nombre a sus dos creadores, Jerzy Neyman y Egon Pearson. (es)
  • ネイマン・ピアソンの補題(ネイマン・ピアソンのほだい)とは、統計学的仮説検定に関する補題。 2つの仮説H0: θ=θ0  と H1: θ=θ1 の間で仮説検定を行う際に、H1を支持しH0を排除するような、次に示す尤度比による尤度比検定: (ただしここで とする)が、サイズ(危険率、第一種過誤) の仮説検定の中で最もパワー(検出力)が大きい、というものである(は第二種過誤)。、が単純仮説であればとなる。 「αを決めておき、その中で検出力が最も大きい検定法を選択する」という方針をネイマン・ピアソンの基準という。この補題はその方法を具体的に与えるものである。ただしこの尤度比検定法が直接用いられるよりも、近似が用いられることが多い。 (ja)
  • In statistica, il lemma fondamentale di Neyman-Pearson asserisce che, quando si opera un test d'ipotesi tra due ipotesi semplici H0: θ=θ0 e H1: θ=θ1, il rapporto delle funzioni di verosomiglianza che rigetta in favore di quando rappresenta il test di verifica più potente a livello di significatività α per una soglia k. Se il test è il più potente per tutti i , si dice che è quello uniformemente più potente (in inglese UMP) tra le alternative del set. Il lemma deve questo nome ai suoi formulatori, Jerzy Neyman e Egon Pearson. (it)
  • Lemat Neymana-Pearsona – twierdzenie z obszaru statystyki opublikowane przez Jerzego Neymana i Egona Pearsona w 1933. Stanowi – w amalgamacie z wcześniejszą propozycją Ronalda Fishera – jedną z podstaw procedury weryfikacji hipotez w podejściu częstościowym. (pl)
  • Das Neyman-Pearson-Lemma, auch Fundamentallemma von Neyman-Pearson oder Fundamentallemma der mathematischen Statistik genannt, ist ein zentraler Satz der Testtheorie und somit auch der mathematischen Statistik, der eine Optimalitätsaussage über die Konstruktion eines Hypothesentests macht. Gegenstand des Neyman-Pearson-Lemmas ist das denkbar einfachste Szenario eines Hypothesentests, das auch Neyman-Pearson-Test genannt wird: Dabei ist sowohl die Nullhypothese als auch die Alternativhypothese einfach, d. h., sie entsprechen jeweils einer einzelnen Wahrscheinlichkeitsverteilung, deren zugehörige Wahrscheinlichkeitsdichten nachfolgend mit und bezeichnet werden. Dann, so die Aussage des Neyman-Pearson-Lemmas, erhält man den besten Test durch eine Entscheidung, bei der die Nullhypothese ve (de)
  • In statistics, the Neyman–Pearson lemma was introduced by Jerzy Neyman and Egon Pearson in a paper in 1933. The Neyman-Pearson lemma is part of the Neyman-Pearson theory of statistical testing, which introduced concepts like errors of the second kind, power function, and inductive behavior. The previous Fisherian theory of significance testing postulated only one hypothesis. By introducing a competing hypothesis, the Neyman-Pearsonian flavor of statistical testing allows investigating the two types of errors. The trivial cases where one always rejects or accepts the null hypothesis are of little interest but it does prove that one must not relinquish control over one type of error while calibrating the other. Neyman and Pearson accordingly proceeded to restrict their attention to the class (en)
  • En statistique, selon le lemme de Neyman-Pearson, lorsque l'on veut effectuer un test d'hypothèse entre deux hypothèses H0 : θ = θ0 et H1 : θ = θ1, pour un échantillon , alors le test du rapport de vraisemblance, qui rejette H0 en faveur de H1 lorsque , où est tel que , est le test le plus puissant de niveau . Ce lemme est nommé d'après Jerzy Neyman et Egon Sharpe Pearson dans un papier de 1931. (fr)
  • Em estatística, o método ou lema de Neyman–Pearson foi introduzido pelo matemático polonês Jerzy Neyman e pelo matemático britânico Egon Pearson em um artigo de 1933. Este lema afirma que, quando se realiza um teste de hipóteses entre duas hipóteses simples e , o teste de razão de verossimilhança que rejeita em favor de quando em que é o teste mais potente ao nível de significância para o limiar . Se o teste for o mais potente para todo , pode ser considerado o uniformemente mais potente (UMP) para alternativas no conjunto . (pt)
rdfs:label
  • Lema de Neyman-Pearson (ca)
  • Neyman-Pearson-Lemma (de)
  • Lema de Neyman-Pearson (es)
  • Lemme de Neyman-Pearson (fr)
  • Lemma fondamentale di Neyman-Pearson (it)
  • ネイマン・ピアソンの補題 (ja)
  • Neyman–Pearson lemma (en)
  • Lemat Neymana-Pearsona (pl)
  • Método de Neyman–Pearson (pt)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:knownFor of
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is dbp:knownFor of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License