An Entity of Type: work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Communicative rationality or communicative reason (German: kommunikative Rationalität) is a theory or set of theories which describes human rationality as a necessary outcome of successful communication. This theory, borne from the over inflation of education in an age of abundance, is in particular, tied to the philosophy of German philosophers Karl-Otto Apel and Jürgen Habermas, and their program of universal pragmatics, along with its related theories such as those on discourse ethics and rational reconstruction. This view of reason is concerned with clarifying the norms and procedures by which agreement can be reached, and is therefore a view of reason as a form of public justification.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • العقل التواصلي أو العقلانية التواصلية هي نظرية أو باقة من النظريات التي تصف العقلانية الإنسانية بوصفها نتيجة ضرورية للإتصال الناجح. وبالتحديد هذه النظرية أو النظريات مرتبطة بفلسفة كارل أوتو آبل ويورغن هابرماس، جنباً إلى جنب النظريات المرتبطة بها مثل تلك المتعلقة بخطاب الأخلاق وإعادة البناء العقلاني. وجهة النظر هذه مرتبطة بالقواعد والإجراءات التي يمكن من خلالها التوصل إلى اتفاق، ومن ثم وجهة نظر حول العقل باعتباره صورة للتوضيح أو التفسير العام. (ar)
  • Communicative rationality or communicative reason (German: kommunikative Rationalität) is a theory or set of theories which describes human rationality as a necessary outcome of successful communication. This theory, borne from the over inflation of education in an age of abundance, is in particular, tied to the philosophy of German philosophers Karl-Otto Apel and Jürgen Habermas, and their program of universal pragmatics, along with its related theories such as those on discourse ethics and rational reconstruction. This view of reason is concerned with clarifying the norms and procedures by which agreement can be reached, and is therefore a view of reason as a form of public justification. According to the theory of communicative rationality, the potential for certain kinds of reason is inherent in communication itself. Building from this, Habermas has tried to formalize that potential in explicit terms. According to Habermas, the phenomena that need to be accounted for by the theory are the "intuitively mastered rules for reaching an understanding and conducting argumentation", possessed by subjects who are capable of speech and action. The goal is to transform this implicit "know-how" into explicit "know-that", i.e. knowledge, about how we conduct ourselves in the realm of "moral-practical" reasoning. The result of the theory is a conception of reason that Habermas sees as doing justice to the most important trends in twentieth century philosophy, while escaping the relativism which characterizes postmodernism, and also providing necessary standards for critical evaluation. (en)
  • Rasionalitas komunikatif adalah teori atau serangkaian teori yang mendeskripsikan rasionalitas manusia sebagai hasil dari komunikasi yang berhasil. Gagasan ini secara khusus terkait dengan filsafat , Jürgen Habermas, program , serta teori yang terkait seperti dan . Cara pandang ini mencoba mengklarifikasi norma dan prosedur untuk mencapai suatu persetujuan, dan memandang nalar sebagai salah satu bentuk justifikasi publik. Menurut teori rasionalitas komunikatif, potensi nalar tertentu melekat dalam komunikasi. Dari sini, Habermas mencoba memformalisasi potensi tersebut dalam istilah eksplisit. Menurut Habermas, fenomena yang perlu dipertimbangkan oleh teori ini adalah "peraturan yang secara intuitif telah dikuasai untuk mencapai dan memahami dan melakukan argumentasi", yang dimiliki oleh mereka yang mampu berbicara dan bertindak. Tujuannya adalah untuk mengubah "" yang implisit menjadi "tahu hal itu" yang eksplisit, misalnya pengetahuan tentang bagaimana kita berlaku dalam ranah penalaran "moral-praktis." (in)
  • Ação comunicativa refere-se a uma teoria desenvolvida por Jürgen Habermas - filósofo e sociólogo alemão. Trata-se de uma análise teórica e epistêmica da racionalidade como sistema operante da sociedade. Habermas contrapõe-se à ideia de que a razão instrumental constitua a própria racionalização da sociedade ou o único padrão de racionalização possível, e introduz o conceito de razão comunicativa. Partindo da perspectiva de que nós seres humanos fazemos coisas com as palavras e que a linguagem constitui uma importante ferramenta de transformação, Habermas argumenta que, por meio da ação comunicativa, podemos transformar os aspectos objetivos, subjetivos e sociais do mundo. Seu objetivo é propor uma alternativa racional à razão instrumental como fundamento da modernidade a partir de uma ampliação e refinamento da própria ideia de razão. Isso o diferencia dos principais frankfurtianos da primeira geração, Adorno e Horkheimer, os quais procuraram alternativas fora do âmbito da racionalidade, a exemplo da arte e do amor. Habermas também cria uma dicotomia entre a ação estratégica e a ação comunicativa.. A ação comunicativa geraria razoabilidade, racionalidade e criticidade, representado uma alternativa à ação estratégica, que seria voltada apenas para os interesses de um grupo ou de indivíduo específico. Habermas propõe a ação comunicativa como forma de fazer com que todos os envolvidos em uma deliberação passem a buscar o consenso em torno de uma solução que beneficie a todos igualmente. Além disso, ele considera que a reflexividade multidimensional aberta pela ação comunicativa e pelos intercâmbios comunicativos foram essenciais para o deslocamento das estruturas simbólicas do mundo da vida, tomadas como dadas e encarnadas em estoques culturais, em práticas sociais e em processos de formação de personalidade. Habermas também buscou definir as normas universais da ação comunicativa. Segundo ele, para que o intercâmbio de argumentos, como procedimento para resolução de questões ético-morais, seja realmente efetivo, faz-se necessário uma aproximação da situação ideal de fala, a qual é caracterizada por: - Imparcialidade. - Expectativa de que todos os participantes transcendam suas preferências iniciais. - Inclusão de todos os afetados por uma decisão. - Igualdade, liberdade e facilidade de interação, com ausência de formas de coerção externas e internas. - Não restrição de tópicos nas discussões. - Revisibilidade de resultados. (pt)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 2463551 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 22562 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1098787875 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:id
  • Calhoun 1992 (en)
  • Cohen 1995 (en)
  • Cooke 1994 (en)
  • Eley 1992 (en)
  • Foucault 1988 (en)
  • Fraser 1987 (en)
  • Habermas 1992 (en)
  • Kompridis 2006 (en)
  • Ryan 1992 (en)
dbp:reference
  • Fraser, N., 1987, "What's Critical About Critical Theory? The Case of Habermas and Gender", in Seyla Benhabib and Drucilla Cornell, eds., Feminism as Critique: On the Politics of Gender , pp. 31–56. (en)
  • Cohen, J.L., 1995, "Critical Social Theory and Feminist Critiques: The Debate with Jürgen Habermas", in Johanna Meehan, ed., Feminists Read Habermas: Gendering the Subject of Discourse , pp. 57–90. (en)
  • Eley, G., 1992, "Nations, Publics, and Political Cultures: Placing Habermas in the Nineteenth Century", in Craig Calhoun, ed., Habermas and the Public Sphere , pp. 289–339. (en)
  • Foucault, M., 1988, "The Ethic of Care for the Self as a Practice of Freedom", in James Bernauer and David Rasmussen, eds., The Final Foucault , pp. 1–20. (en)
  • Cook, M., 1994, Language and Reason: A Study in Habermas's Pragmatics . (en)
  • Kompridis, N., 2006, Critique and Disclosure: Critical Theory between Past and Future. Cambridge, Massachusetts:MIT Press. (en)
  • Calhoun, C., 1992, ed., Habermas and the Public Sphere . (en)
  • Ryan, M.P., 1992, "Gender and Public Access: Women's Politics in Nineteenth-Century America", in Craig Calhoun, ed., Habermas and the Public Sphere , pp. 259–288. (en)
  • Habermas, J., 1992, "Themes in Postmetaphysical Thinking", in Postmetaphysical Thinking: Philosophical Essays, W. Hohengarten, trans. , pp. 28–57. (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
gold:hypernym
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • العقل التواصلي أو العقلانية التواصلية هي نظرية أو باقة من النظريات التي تصف العقلانية الإنسانية بوصفها نتيجة ضرورية للإتصال الناجح. وبالتحديد هذه النظرية أو النظريات مرتبطة بفلسفة كارل أوتو آبل ويورغن هابرماس، جنباً إلى جنب النظريات المرتبطة بها مثل تلك المتعلقة بخطاب الأخلاق وإعادة البناء العقلاني. وجهة النظر هذه مرتبطة بالقواعد والإجراءات التي يمكن من خلالها التوصل إلى اتفاق، ومن ثم وجهة نظر حول العقل باعتباره صورة للتوضيح أو التفسير العام. (ar)
  • Communicative rationality or communicative reason (German: kommunikative Rationalität) is a theory or set of theories which describes human rationality as a necessary outcome of successful communication. This theory, borne from the over inflation of education in an age of abundance, is in particular, tied to the philosophy of German philosophers Karl-Otto Apel and Jürgen Habermas, and their program of universal pragmatics, along with its related theories such as those on discourse ethics and rational reconstruction. This view of reason is concerned with clarifying the norms and procedures by which agreement can be reached, and is therefore a view of reason as a form of public justification. (en)
  • Rasionalitas komunikatif adalah teori atau serangkaian teori yang mendeskripsikan rasionalitas manusia sebagai hasil dari komunikasi yang berhasil. Gagasan ini secara khusus terkait dengan filsafat , Jürgen Habermas, program , serta teori yang terkait seperti dan . Cara pandang ini mencoba mengklarifikasi norma dan prosedur untuk mencapai suatu persetujuan, dan memandang nalar sebagai salah satu bentuk justifikasi publik. (in)
  • Ação comunicativa refere-se a uma teoria desenvolvida por Jürgen Habermas - filósofo e sociólogo alemão. Trata-se de uma análise teórica e epistêmica da racionalidade como sistema operante da sociedade. Habermas contrapõe-se à ideia de que a razão instrumental constitua a própria racionalização da sociedade ou o único padrão de racionalização possível, e introduz o conceito de razão comunicativa. Partindo da perspectiva de que nós seres humanos fazemos coisas com as palavras e que a linguagem constitui uma importante ferramenta de transformação, Habermas argumenta que, por meio da ação comunicativa, podemos transformar os aspectos objetivos, subjetivos e sociais do mundo. Seu objetivo é propor uma alternativa racional à razão instrumental como fundamento da modernidade a partir de uma ampl (pt)
rdfs:label
  • عقل تواصلي (ar)
  • Communicative rationality (en)
  • Rasionalitas komunikatif (in)
  • Ação comunicativa (pt)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:notableIdea of
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License