This HTML5 document contains 127 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n12https://web.archive.org/web/20190427233320/https:/scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/
dbpedia-kohttp://ko.dbpedia.org/resource/
dbpedia-eshttp://es.dbpedia.org/resource/
n24https://web.archive.org/web/20081030004354/http:/www.sherby.co.il/
n19https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
n4https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/cgi/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
n11https://web.archive.org/web/20060626211154/http:/www.jus.uio.no/lm/brussels.jurisdiction.and.enforcement.of.judgments.in.civil.and.commercial.matters.convention.1968/
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
dbpedia-srhttp://sr.dbpedia.org/resource/
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n18http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/brussels.jurisdiction.and.enforcement.of.judgments.in.civil.and.commercial.matters.convention.1968/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n25https://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbpedia-frhttp://fr.dbpedia.org/resource/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Forum_non_conveniens
rdf:type
yago:Belief105941423 yago:Content105809192 yago:Doctrine105943300 yago:WikicatLegalDoctrinesAndPrinciples yago:Abstraction100002137 dbo:MilitaryUnit yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:Cognition100023271
rdfs:label
Forum non conveniens Forum non conveniens Forum non conveniens 불편한 법정의 원칙
rdfs:comment
Forum non conveniens (Latin for "an inconvenient forum") (FNC) is a mostly common law legal doctrine through which a court acknowledges that another forum or court where the case might have been brought is a more appropriate venue for a legal case, and transfers the case to such a forum. A change of venue might be ordered, for example, to transfer a case to a jurisdiction within which an accident or incident underlying the litigation occurred and where all the witnesses reside. La règle du Forum non conveniens (FNC, « forum incommode » en latin) est une doctrine juridique que l'on retrouve principalement dans les pays de common law par laquelle un tribunal « reconnaît qu'un autre forum ou tribunal est plus approprié et renvoie l'affaire à un tel forum. Un renvoi devant une autre juridiction est possible, lorsqu'une autre juridiction est plus appropriée pour statuer sur une affaire, par ex. la juridiction dans laquelle un accident s'est produit et où résident tous les témoins ». Forum non conveniens (locución latina para «un foro inconveniente» ​ ​ ​) (FNC) es una doctrina legal mayoritariamente de derecho consuetudinario a través de la cual un tribunal reconoce que otro foro o tribunal donde el caso podría haberse presentado es un lugar más apropiado para un caso legal, y transfiere el caso a dicho foro. Se puede ordenar un cambio de jurisdicción, por ejemplo, para transferir un caso a una jurisdicción dentro de la cual ocurrió un accidente o incidente subyacente al litigio y donde residen todos los testigos. ​ 불편한 법정의 원칙(Forum non conveniens)은 법관의 재량에 의하여 타지역의 법원의 재판관할권 행사를 자제할 수 있다는 종래 영국에서 인정되었던 법원칙이다. 이는 법원에 과도한 재량권을 부여할 뿐 아니라 외국인이 제소한 사건의 재판을 거부하는 구실이 되는 등의 불합리의 근거가 되는 단점을 가지고 있다.
dcterms:subject
dbc:Legal_rules_with_Latin_names dbc:Legal_doctrines_and_principles dbc:Venue_(law)
dbo:wikiPageID
1679959
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1123946073
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Habitual_residence dbr:European_Community dbr:Civil_procedure dbr:United_Kingdom dbr:Denmark dbr:Enforcement_of_foreign_judgments dbr:EFTA dbr:Lis_alibi_pendens dbr:Public_policy_(law) dbr:Party_(law) dbr:Witnesses dbr:Latin dbr:Conflict_of_laws dbr:United_States dbr:Lawsuit dbr:Civil_law_(legal_system) dbr:Federal_Employers_Liability_Act dbr:Common_law dbr:Evidence_(law) dbr:Roman_law dbr:Lex_fori dbr:Lien dbr:Court_of_Appeal_of_England_and_Wales dbr:European_Union dbr:Phillips_v_Eyre dbr:Comity dbc:Legal_rules_with_Latin_names dbr:Maritime_law dbr:Forum_selection_clause dbr:Undue_hardship dbr:Brussels_I_Regulation dbr:Lex_loci_solutionis dbr:Lawyer dbr:Admiralty_law dbr:Defendant dbr:High_Court_of_Australia dbr:Treaty dbr:Trial_de_novo dbr:Judicial dbr:Lex_situs dbr:Legal_doctrine dbr:Choice_of_law dbr:Consignee dbr:Demurrage dbr:Venue_(law) dbr:Letters_rogatory dbr:Agent_(law) dbr:Civil_Jurisdiction_and_Judgments_Act_1982 dbr:Civil_Jurisdiction_and_Judgments_Act_1991 dbr:Republic_of_Panama dbr:Real_and_substantial_connection dbc:Legal_doctrines_and_principles dbr:Scotland dbr:English_law dbr:Jurisdiction_(area) dbr:European_Court_of_Justice dbr:Jurisdiction dbr:Miami,_Florida dbr:England dbc:Venue_(law) dbr:Due_process dbr:Equal_protection dbr:Exclusive_jurisdiction dbr:Napoleonic_Code dbr:Brussels_Convention dbr:Forum_shopping dbr:Relevance_(law) dbr:Civilian_law
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n4:viewcontent.cgi%3Farticle=1022&context=bjil n11:doc.html n12:viewcontent.cgi%3Farticle=3543&context=californialawreview n18:doc.html n24:200803ILQ.pdf n25:viewcontent.cgi%3Farticle=3543&context=californialawreview
owl:sameAs
dbpedia-fr:Forum_non_conveniens dbpedia-ko:불편한_법정의_원칙 yago-res:Forum_non_conveniens wikidata:Q5473126 n19:4jWTt freebase:m.05mvj1 dbpedia-sr:Forum_non_conveniens dbpedia-es:Forum_non_conveniens
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Short_description dbt:Expand_section dbt:Conflict_of_laws dbt:Reflist dbt:According_to_whom dbt:Citation_needed dbt:Unreferenced_section dbt:Portal dbt:Italic_title dbt:Aut dbt:Blockquote dbt:Webarchive
dbp:date
2019-04-27 2006-06-26
dbp:url
n12:viewcontent.cgi%3Farticle=3543&context=californialawreview n11:doc.html
dbo:abstract
La règle du Forum non conveniens (FNC, « forum incommode » en latin) est une doctrine juridique que l'on retrouve principalement dans les pays de common law par laquelle un tribunal « reconnaît qu'un autre forum ou tribunal est plus approprié et renvoie l'affaire à un tel forum. Un renvoi devant une autre juridiction est possible, lorsqu'une autre juridiction est plus appropriée pour statuer sur une affaire, par ex. la juridiction dans laquelle un accident s'est produit et où résident tous les témoins ». En tant que doctrine du conflit de lois, la règle du forum non conveniens s'applique entre les tribunaux de pays différents et entre les tribunaux de ressorts législatifs différents dans le même pays. Une inquiétude fréquemment soulevée dans les applications de la doctrine est a recherche du forum le plus favorable (anglais :forum shopping), ou que l'on puisse faire le choix d'un tribunal simplement pour obtenir un avantage dans la procédure. Dans les systèmes de droit romano-civiliste, la doctrine juridique du lis alibi pendens énonce des principes similaires. La règle du forum non conveniens n'est pas appliquée seulement par les pays de common law : les tribunaux maritimes du Panama, bien qu'ils ne soient pas une juridiction de common law, ont également un tel pouvoir de décliner compétence dans des conditions plus restreintes. 불편한 법정의 원칙(Forum non conveniens)은 법관의 재량에 의하여 타지역의 법원의 재판관할권 행사를 자제할 수 있다는 종래 영국에서 인정되었던 법원칙이다. 이는 법원에 과도한 재량권을 부여할 뿐 아니라 외국인이 제소한 사건의 재판을 거부하는 구실이 되는 등의 불합리의 근거가 되는 단점을 가지고 있다. Forum non conveniens (locución latina para «un foro inconveniente» ​ ​ ​) (FNC) es una doctrina legal mayoritariamente de derecho consuetudinario a través de la cual un tribunal reconoce que otro foro o tribunal donde el caso podría haberse presentado es un lugar más apropiado para un caso legal, y transfiere el caso a dicho foro. Se puede ordenar un cambio de jurisdicción, por ejemplo, para transferir un caso a una jurisdicción dentro de la cual ocurrió un accidente o incidente subyacente al litigio y donde residen todos los testigos. ​ Una preocupación que a menudo se plantea en las aplicaciones de la doctrina es la selección de foros, o la elección de un tribunal simplemente para obtener una ventaja en el procedimiento. Esta preocupación se equilibra con la política pública de deferir la elección de jurisdicción del demandante en reclamaciones en las que puede haber más de una jurisdicción apropiada. Los principios subyacentes, como basar el respeto otorgado a los tribunales extranjeros en el respeto recíproco o la cortesía, también se aplican en los sistemas de derecho civil en la forma de la doctrina legal de litispendencia. Forum non conveniens no es exclusivo de las naciones de common law: los tribunales marítimos de la República de Panamá, aunque no son una jurisdicción del derecho anglosajón, también tienen tal facultad en condiciones más restringidas. ​ Forum non conveniens (Latin for "an inconvenient forum") (FNC) is a mostly common law legal doctrine through which a court acknowledges that another forum or court where the case might have been brought is a more appropriate venue for a legal case, and transfers the case to such a forum. A change of venue might be ordered, for example, to transfer a case to a jurisdiction within which an accident or incident underlying the litigation occurred and where all the witnesses reside. As a doctrine of the conflict of laws, forum non conveniens applies between courts in different countries and between courts in different jurisdictions in the same country. Forum non conveniens is not applicable between counties or federal districts within a state. A concern often raised in applications of the doctrine is forum shopping, or picking a court merely to gain an advantage in the proceeding. This concern is balanced against the public policy of deferring to a plaintiff's choice of venue in claims where there may be more than one appropriate jurisdiction. The underlying principles, such as basing respect given to foreign courts on reciprocal respect or comity, also apply in civil law systems in the form of the legal doctrine of lis alibi pendens. Forum non conveniens is not exclusive to common law nations: the maritime courts of the Republic of Panama, although not a common law jurisdiction, also have such power under more restrained conditions.
gold:hypernym
dbr:Doctrine
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Forum_non_conveniens?oldid=1123946073&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
27128
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Forum_non_conveniens