This HTML5 document contains 154 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n22http://dbpedia.org/resource/Wikt:
dcthttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n12https://education.jhu.edu/2020/10/an-american-return-to-civil-discourse/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n7http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:
n24https://nicd.arizona.edu/
n16https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n9https://archive.org/details/citizencompetenc0000elki/page/
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n21http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
dbpedia-arhttp://ar.dbpedia.org/resource/
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
n8https://archive.org/details/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n26https://hbr.org/2016/11/
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
n25https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Carl_Diggler
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Civil_discourse
Subject Item
dbr:Rogerian_argument
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Civil_discourse
Subject Item
dbr:List_of_protests_and_demonstrations_in_the_United_States_by_size
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Civil_discourse
Subject Item
dbr:Incivility
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Civil_discourse
Subject Item
dbr:Index_of_philosophy_articles_(A–C)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Civil_discourse
Subject Item
dbr:Public_sphere_pedagogy
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Civil_discourse
Subject Item
dbr:Civil_discourse
rdf:type
owl:Thing dbo:MilitaryConflict
rdfs:label
نقاش مجتمعي Civil discourse
rdfs:comment
Civil discourse is the engagement in discourse (conversation) intended to enhance understanding; Civil discourse exists as a function of freedom of speech. It is discourse that "supports, rather than undermines the societal good." An example of civil discourse was the "robust, honest, frank and constructive dialogue and deliberation that seeks to advance the public interest" by an assortment of national leaders in 2011 during a conversation at the U.S. Supreme Court. In contrast, uncivil discourse is "language characterized as containing direct insults, willful misattribution of motive without due reason, and open contempt." النقاش المجتمعي هو المشاركة في نقاش (حوار) يرمي إلى تعزيز التفاهم. يصف كينيث جي جيرغن النقاش المجتمعي بأنه «عنوان الموضوعية النزيهة» ويرجح أنه يحتاج إلى احترام الأطراف الأخرى المشاركة ومن بينهم القارئ. وهذا النقاش لا يقلل من القيمة الأخلاقية للآخرين ولا يشكك في حكمهم السديد، ولكنه يتجنب العنف أو الخصومة اللدودة أو القناعات المتطرفة، ولتحقيق ذلك لا بد من التواضع وتقدير خبرات الآخرين. في الكتاب الثالث من مقال حول التفاهم البشري (1690) يفرق جون لوك بين النقاش المجتمعي والنقاش الفلسفي (أو النقاش البلاغي) حيث إن أولاهما يصب في صالح القارئ والمصلحة العامة:أعني بـ
rdfs:seeAlso
dbr:Information_Age
foaf:depiction
n21:John_Locke_memorial_stone.jpg n21:Thessaloniki_model_united_nations_2009.jpg n21:Thomas_Jefferson_LCCN2003679978.jpg
dct:subject
dbc:Etiquette dbc:Sociolinguistics
dbo:wikiPageID
23989984
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1122713367
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:On_Liberty dbr:Speech_code dbr:Journal_of_Higher_Education_Outreach_and_Engagement dbr:Miranda_Fricker dbr:Johns_Hopkins_University dbr:Algorithm dbr:Social_media dbr:American_University dbr:On_the_Media dbr:Deliberative_democracy dbr:The_Open_Mind_(talk_show) dbr:United_States_presidential_debates dbr:George_H._W._Bush dbr:Technolibertarianism dbr:Deliberation dbr:Discourse dbr:Confirmation_bias n7:Thomas_Jefferson_LCCN2003679978.jpg dbr:Tucson,_Arizona dbr:Narcissism dbr:Digital_Revolution dbr:Google dbr:Etiquette dbr:Arthur_W._Chickering dbr:Discourse_analysis dbr:Discourse_community dbr:Discourse_ethics dbr:Civic_virtue dbr:Respect dbr:Self-censorship dbr:John_Stuart_Mill dbr:Etiquette_in_technology dbr:Tone_policing n7:Thessaloniki_model_united_nations_2009.jpg dbr:John_Sexton dbr:Marshall_McLuhan dbc:Sociolinguistics dbr:University_of_Michigan dbr:The_Cult_of_the_Amateur dbc:Etiquette dbr:Internet_age dbr:Information_Age dbr:Printing_press dbr:Thomas_Jefferson dbr:An_Essay_Concerning_Human_Understanding dbr:Freedom_of_speech dbr:Search_engine dbr:Herbert_Marcuse dbr:Black_Lives_Matter dbr:Bias dbr:Northeastern_University dbr:Rhetoric dbr:Artificial_intelligence dbr:Citizens_for_Civil_Discourse dbr:The_Open_Mind_(TV_series) dbr:The_medium_is_the_message dbr:PBS dbr:Chatbot n7:John_Locke_memorial_stone.jpg dbr:Bill_Clinton dbr:Brooke_Gladstone dbr:Gabby_Giffords dbr:Public_interest dbr:Epistemic_responsibility dbr:Madeleine_Albright dbr:U.S._Supreme_Court dbr:Epistemic_virtue dbr:Reynol_Junco dbr:U.S._federal_judiciary dbr:Public_good_(economics) dbr:Filter_bubble dbr:Donald_Trump dbr:Charles_Koch_Institute dbr:United_States_district_court dbr:John_Locke dbr:Andrew_Keen n22:uncivil dbr:Common_ground_(communication_technique) dbr:Kenneth_J._Gergen dbr:Crowdsourcing dbr:First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Rogerian_argument dbr:Common_good dbr:Information_and_communications_technology dbr:University_of_Arizona dbr:Wikipedia dbr:Epistemic_injustice dbr:Inauguration_of_Donald_Trump dbr:Conversation dbr:Katie_Couric dbr:Algorithmic_bias dbr:Dialogue dbr:Argumentation_theory dbr:Search_engine_optimization dbr:Stanford_University dbr:Paradox_of_tolerance dbr:Archon_Fung dbr:Robin_L._Rosenberg dbr:Google_Account
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n8:openmind_ep1794 n9:40 n12: n24: n25:608 n26:how-wikipedia-keeps-political-discourse-from-turning-ugly
owl:sameAs
wikidata:Q5124653 n16:4hddj dbpedia-ar:نقاش_مجتمعي freebase:m.0fhmq6
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Wiktionary dbt:Sm dbt:Slink dbt:Globalize dbt:Div_col dbt:Div_col_end dbt:Cite_book dbt:See_also dbt:Citation_needed dbt:According_to_whom dbt:Blockquote
dbo:thumbnail
n21:John_Locke_memorial_stone.jpg?width=300
dbo:abstract
Civil discourse is the engagement in discourse (conversation) intended to enhance understanding; Civil discourse exists as a function of freedom of speech. It is discourse that "supports, rather than undermines the societal good." An example of civil discourse was the "robust, honest, frank and constructive dialogue and deliberation that seeks to advance the public interest" by an assortment of national leaders in 2011 during a conversation at the U.S. Supreme Court. In contrast, uncivil discourse is "language characterized as containing direct insults, willful misattribution of motive without due reason, and open contempt." The definition of civil, in civil discourse, can have two distinct meanings, according to professor of public policy Archon Fung: The first is a superficial kind of civility—being nice, refraining from insults or ad-hominem kinds of argument. The second is a deeper, more important (and older, for what that's worth) sense of civility that is about behaving in ways that are necessary for cooperative projects such as schools and democratic societies to work well. This deeper sense of civility comes from the Latin civilitas—relating to citizens. Civility in this sense is behavior that is important for good citizenship. The definition of discourse is a verbal exchange of "thoughts and ideas, especially in a formal manner." Dictionary.com defines discourse as a formal discussion of a subject in speech or writing, as a dissertation, treatise, sermon, etc. Civil Discourse is * Truthful * Productive * Audience-based * About listening and talking * Each Speaker's own responsibility Civil Discourse is not * Mere politeness * An exercise in martyrdom * About telling other people who they are * Purely performative النقاش المجتمعي هو المشاركة في نقاش (حوار) يرمي إلى تعزيز التفاهم. يصف كينيث جي جيرغن النقاش المجتمعي بأنه «عنوان الموضوعية النزيهة» ويرجح أنه يحتاج إلى احترام الأطراف الأخرى المشاركة ومن بينهم القارئ. وهذا النقاش لا يقلل من القيمة الأخلاقية للآخرين ولا يشكك في حكمهم السديد، ولكنه يتجنب العنف أو الخصومة اللدودة أو القناعات المتطرفة، ولتحقيق ذلك لا بد من التواضع وتقدير خبرات الآخرين. في الكتاب الثالث من مقال حول التفاهم البشري (1690) يفرق جون لوك بين النقاش المجتمعي والنقاش الفلسفي (أو النقاش البلاغي) حيث إن أولاهما يصب في صالح القارئ والمصلحة العامة:أعني بـ
gold:hypernym
dbr:Engagement
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Civil_discourse?oldid=1122713367&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
62582
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Civil_discourse
Subject Item
dbr:Gen-Z_for_Change
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Civil_discourse
Subject Item
dbr:Microaggression
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Civil_discourse
Subject Item
dbr:Aidan_Kohn-Murphy
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Civil_discourse
Subject Item
dbr:Arne_Næss
rdfs:seeAlso
dbr:Civil_discourse
Subject Item
dbr:Refuse_Fascism
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Civil_discourse
Subject Item
dbr:Statue_of_Thomas_Jefferson_(University_of_Virginia)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Civil_discourse
Subject Item
wikipedia-en:Civil_discourse
foaf:primaryTopic
dbr:Civil_discourse