An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

United States v. Kagama, 118 U.S. 375 (1886), was a United States Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of the Major Crimes Act of 1885. This Congressional act gave the federal courts jurisdiction in certain Indian-on-Indian crimes, even if they were committed on an Indian reservation. Kagama, a Yurok Native American (Indian) accused of murder, was selected as a test case by the Department of Justice to test the constitutionality of the Act.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • United States v. Kagama, 118 U.S. 375 (1886), was a United States Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of the Major Crimes Act of 1885. This Congressional act gave the federal courts jurisdiction in certain Indian-on-Indian crimes, even if they were committed on an Indian reservation. Kagama, a Yurok Native American (Indian) accused of murder, was selected as a test case by the Department of Justice to test the constitutionality of the Act. The importance of the ruling in this case was that it tested the constitutionality of the Act and confirmed Congress's authority over Indian affairs. Plenary power over Indian tribes, supposedly granted to the U.S. Congress by the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, was not deemed necessary to support the Supreme Court in this decision. Instead, the Court found the power in the tribes' status as dependent domestic nations, which allowed Congress to pass the Dawes Act the following year. The case has been criticized by legal scholars as drawing on powers that are not granted to Congress by the Constitution, but it remains good law. (en)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 10341904 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 30473 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1088425905 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-03-02 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1886 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • United States v. Kagama, (en)
dbp:cornell
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:fullname
  • United States v. Kagama, alias Pactah Billy, an Indian, and another. (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:holding
  • The Major Crimes Act was constitutional, and, therefore, the case was within the jurisdiction of the federal courts. This ruling meant that the San Francisco Court's indictment would stand. (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • unanimous (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
  • U.S. Const. Art. I, § 8, cl. 3; (en)
dbp:litigants
  • United States v. Kagama (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Miller (en)
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 6 (xsd:integer)
dbp:submitdate
  • 0001-05-10 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:submityear
  • 1886 (xsd:integer)
dbp:uspage
  • 375 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 118 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • United States v. Kagama, 118 U.S. 375 (1886), was a United States Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of the Major Crimes Act of 1885. This Congressional act gave the federal courts jurisdiction in certain Indian-on-Indian crimes, even if they were committed on an Indian reservation. Kagama, a Yurok Native American (Indian) accused of murder, was selected as a test case by the Department of Justice to test the constitutionality of the Act. (en)
rdfs:label
  • United States v. Kagama (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • United States v. Kagama, alias Pactah Billy, an Indian, and another. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License