About: Quinto v. COMELEC

An Entity of Type: Thing, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Quinto v. COMELEC (G.R. No. 189698) is a controversial decision of the Supreme Court of the Philippines which paved the way, albeit temporarily, for incumbent appointive executive officials to stay in office after filing their certificates of candidacy for election to an elective office. The decision was first decided by a slim majority of 8-6, but was eventually reversed 10-5 upon a motion for reconsideration after the retirement of one justice and the appointment of two new ones.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Quinto v. COMELEC (G.R. No. 189698) is a controversial decision of the Supreme Court of the Philippines which paved the way, albeit temporarily, for incumbent appointive executive officials to stay in office after filing their certificates of candidacy for election to an elective office. The decision was first decided by a slim majority of 8-6, but was eventually reversed 10-5 upon a motion for reconsideration after the retirement of one justice and the appointment of two new ones. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 26861886 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 14677 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1021901097 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:chiefjudge
  • Reynato Puno (en)
dbp:citations
  • G.R. No. 189698 (en)
dbp:court
  • SC (en)
dbp:dateDecided
  • 2009-12-01 (xsd:date)
dbp:decisionBy
  • Antonio Nachura , Reynato Puno (en)
dbp:fullName
  • Eleazar P. Quinto and Gerino A. Tolentino Jr. v. Commission on Elections (en)
dbp:mr2denied
  • 2010-03-02 (xsd:date)
dbp:mraccepted
  • 2010-02-22 (xsd:date)
dbp:name
  • Quinto v. COMELEC (en)
dbp:opinions
  • Corona, Velasco Jr., Nachura, Leonardo-De Castro, Bersamin (en)
  • Dissent: 5 (en)
  • Majority: 10 (en)
  • Puno, Carpio, Carpio Morales, Brion, Peralta, Del Castillo, Abad, Villarama, Jr., Perez, Mendoza (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdfs:comment
  • Quinto v. COMELEC (G.R. No. 189698) is a controversial decision of the Supreme Court of the Philippines which paved the way, albeit temporarily, for incumbent appointive executive officials to stay in office after filing their certificates of candidacy for election to an elective office. The decision was first decided by a slim majority of 8-6, but was eventually reversed 10-5 upon a motion for reconsideration after the retirement of one justice and the appointment of two new ones. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Quinto v. COMELEC (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License