| dbo:abstract
|
- Real or perceived ideological bias on the free online encyclopedia Wikipedia, especially on its English-language edition, has been a frequent subject of academic analysis and public criticism of the project. Questions relate to whether its content is biased due to the political, religious, or other ideology of its volunteer editors, and the effects this may have on the encyclopedia's reliability. Wikipedia has an internal policy which states that articles must be written from a neutral point of view, which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all of the significant points of view that have been verifiably published by reliable sources on a topic. Collectively, findings show that Wikipedia articles edited by large numbers of editors with opposing ideological views are at least as neutral as other similar sources, but articles with smaller edit volumes by fewer—or more ideologically homogeneous—contributors are more likely to reflect an editorial bias. (en)
- Pertanyaan-pertanyaan soal ketimpangan ideologi di Wikipedia tercantum dalam analisis akademik dan kritikan publik terhadap Wikipedia, dan khususnya situs berbahasa Inggrisnya, dalam kaitannya soal apakah kontennya mengalami ketimpangan atau tidak atas dasar , agama atau ideologi lain dari para penyunting Wikipedia sukarelanya dan dampak apapun yang dimiliki pada keandalan ensiklopedia daring tersebut . (in)
|
| rdfs:comment
|
- Pertanyaan-pertanyaan soal ketimpangan ideologi di Wikipedia tercantum dalam analisis akademik dan kritikan publik terhadap Wikipedia, dan khususnya situs berbahasa Inggrisnya, dalam kaitannya soal apakah kontennya mengalami ketimpangan atau tidak atas dasar , agama atau ideologi lain dari para penyunting Wikipedia sukarelanya dan dampak apapun yang dimiliki pada keandalan ensiklopedia daring tersebut . (in)
- Real or perceived ideological bias on the free online encyclopedia Wikipedia, especially on its English-language edition, has been a frequent subject of academic analysis and public criticism of the project. Questions relate to whether its content is biased due to the political, religious, or other ideology of its volunteer editors, and the effects this may have on the encyclopedia's reliability. (en)
|
