dbo:abstract
|
- American Legion v. American Humanist Association, 588 U.S. ___ (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the separation of church and state related to maintaining the Peace Cross, a World War I memorial shaped after a Latin cross, on government-owned land, though initially built in 1925 with private funds on private lands. The case was a consolidation of two petitions to the court, that of The American Legion who built the cross (Docket 17-1717), and of the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission who own the land and maintain the memorial (Docket 18-18). Both petitions challenged the Fourth Circuit's ruling that, regardless of the secular purpose the cross was built for in honoring the deceased soldiers, the cross emboldened a religious symbol and had ordered it altered or razed. The Supreme Court reversed the Fourth Circuit's ruling in a 7–2 decision, determining that since the Cross had stood for decades without controversy, it did not violate the Establishment Clause and could remain standing. (en)
|
dbo:thumbnail
| |
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 26559 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-02-27 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:argueyear
| |
dbp:case
|
- The American Legion v. American Humanist Association, No. 17-1717, 588 U.S. ___ (en)
|
dbp:concurrence
|
- Thomas (en)
- Kavanaugh (en)
- Breyer (en)
- Kagan (en)
- Gorsuch (en)
|
dbp:cornell
| |
dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-06-20 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:decideyear
| |
dbp:dissent
| |
dbp:docket
| |
dbp:fullname
|
- The American Legion, et al. v. American Humanist Association, et al. (en)
|
dbp:googlescholar
| |
dbp:holding
|
- Though a symbol of Christianity, the cross on public land does not violate the establishment clause of the First Amendment due to its historical value as a war memorial that has stood for nearly 100 years. (en)
|
dbp:joinconcurrence
| |
dbp:joindissent
| |
dbp:joinmajority
|
- Roberts, Breyer, Kagan, and Kavanaugh (en)
|
dbp:joinplurality
|
- Roberts, Breyer, and Kavanaugh (en)
|
dbp:justia
| |
dbp:litigants
|
- American Legion v. American Humanist Association (en)
|
dbp:majority
| |
dbp:otherSource
| |
dbp:otherUrl
| |
dbp:oyez
| |
dbp:parallelcitations
| |
dbp:plurality
| |
dbp:prior
| |
dbp:questionspresented
|
- Whether a 93-year-old memorial to the fallen of World War I is unconstitutional merely because it is shaped like a cross, whether the constitutionality of a passive display incorporating religious symbolism should be assessed under prior case law tests, and whether the expenditure of funds for routine upkeep and maintenance of a cross-shaped war memorial, without more, amounts to an excessive entanglement with religion in violation of the First Amendment (en)
|
dbp:uspage
| |
dbp:usvol
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dcterms:subject
| |
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- American Legion v. American Humanist Association, 588 U.S. ___ (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the separation of church and state related to maintaining the Peace Cross, a World War I memorial shaped after a Latin cross, on government-owned land, though initially built in 1925 with private funds on private lands. The case was a consolidation of two petitions to the court, that of The American Legion who built the cross (Docket 17-1717), and of the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission who own the land and maintain the memorial (Docket 18-18). Both petitions challenged the Fourth Circuit's ruling that, regardless of the secular purpose the cross was built for in honoring the deceased soldiers, the cross emboldened a religious symbol and had order (en)
|
rdfs:label
|
- American Legion v. American Humanist Association (en)
|
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:depiction
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
foaf:name
|
- (en)
- The American Legion, et al. v. American Humanist Association, et al. (en)
|
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |