About: Edwards v. Vannoy     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FEdwards_v._Vannoy

Edwards v. Vannoy is a United States Supreme Court case involving the Court's prior decision in Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), which had ruled that jury verdicts in criminal trials must be unanimous under the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The Supreme Court ruled 6–3 that Ramos did not apply retroactively to earlier cases prior to their verdict in Ramos.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Edwards v. Vannoy
  • Edwards v. Vannoy
rdfs:comment
  • Edwards v. Vannoy is a United States Supreme Court case involving the Court's prior decision in Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), which had ruled that jury verdicts in criminal trials must be unanimous under the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The Supreme Court ruled 6–3 that Ramos did not apply retroactively to earlier cases prior to their verdict in Ramos.
  • Edwards v. Vannoy é um caso da Suprema Corte dos Estados Unidos envolvendo uma decisão anterior da corte no caso Ramos v. Louisiana, que decidiu que os veredictos do júri em julgamentos criminais devem ser unânimes nos termos da Sexta Emenda, da Constituição dos EUA. A Suprema Corte julgou de 6 votos para 3 que o caso de Ramos não se aplicava retroativamente a casos anteriores.
foaf:name
  • Thedrick Edwards v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
dct:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
sameAs
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
ArgueDate
  • --12-02
has abstract
  • Edwards v. Vannoy is a United States Supreme Court case involving the Court's prior decision in Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), which had ruled that jury verdicts in criminal trials must be unanimous under the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The Supreme Court ruled 6–3 that Ramos did not apply retroactively to earlier cases prior to their verdict in Ramos.
  • Edwards v. Vannoy é um caso da Suprema Corte dos Estados Unidos envolvendo uma decisão anterior da corte no caso Ramos v. Louisiana, que decidiu que os veredictos do júri em julgamentos criminais devem ser unânimes nos termos da Sexta Emenda, da Constituição dos EUA. A Suprema Corte julgou de 6 votos para 3 que o caso de Ramos não se aplicava retroativamente a casos anteriores.
ArgueYear
case
  • Edwards v. Vannoy
DecideDate
  • --05-17
DecideYear
Holding
  • The Ramos jury-unanimity rule does not apply retroactively on federal collateral review.
JoinMajority
  • Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Barrett
Litigants
  • Edwards v. Vannoy
Prior
  • 259200.0
USPage
  • ___
USVol
Overturned previous case
  • Teague v. Lane
Concurrence
  • Thomas
  • Gorsuch
Dissent
  • Kagan
Docket
JoinConcurrence
  • Thomas
  • Gorsuch
JoinDissent
  • Breyer, Sotomayor
oyez
fullname
  • Thedrick Edwards v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
majority
  • Kavanaugh
prov:wasDerivedFrom
page length (characters) of wiki page
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is rdfs:seeAlso of
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git97 as of Feb 07 2022


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3323 as of May 9 2022, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc25), Single-Server Edition (62 GB total memory, 42 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2022 OpenLink Software