About: Ramos v. Louisiana     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FRamos_v._Louisiana

Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution requires that guilty verdicts for criminal trials be unanimous. Only cases in Oregon were affected by the ruling, because every other state already had this requirement. The decision incorporated the Sixth Amendment requirement for unanimous jury criminal convictions against the states, and thereby overturned the Court's previous decision from the 1972 case Apodaca v. Oregon.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Ramos v. Louisiana
rdfs:comment
  • Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution requires that guilty verdicts for criminal trials be unanimous. Only cases in Oregon were affected by the ruling, because every other state already had this requirement. The decision incorporated the Sixth Amendment requirement for unanimous jury criminal convictions against the states, and thereby overturned the Court's previous decision from the 1972 case Apodaca v. Oregon.
rdfs:seeAlso
foaf:name
  • Evangelisto Ramos, Petitioner v. Louisiana
dct:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
sameAs
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
ArgueDate
  • --10-07
other source
  • Supreme Court
other url
has abstract
  • Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution requires that guilty verdicts for criminal trials be unanimous. Only cases in Oregon were affected by the ruling, because every other state already had this requirement. The decision incorporated the Sixth Amendment requirement for unanimous jury criminal convictions against the states, and thereby overturned the Court's previous decision from the 1972 case Apodaca v. Oregon.
ArgueYear
case
  • Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. ___
DecideDate
  • --04-20
DecideYear
Holding
  • The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires that guilty verdicts for criminal trials be unanimous.
JoinMajority
  • Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kavanaugh ; Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor ; Ginsburg, Breyer
justia
LawsApplied
Litigants
  • Ramos v. Louisiana
ParallelCitations
  • 17280.0
Prior
  • 259200.0
USPage
  • ___
USVol
Overturned previous case
  • Apodaca v. Oregon
Concurrence
  • Thomas
  • Sotomayor
  • Kavanaugh
courtlistener
Dissent
  • Alito
Docket
JoinDissent
  • Roberts; Kagan
OralArgument
oyez
fullname
  • Evangelisto Ramos, Petitioner v. Louisiana
majority
  • Gorsuch
prov:wasDerivedFrom
page length (characters) of wiki page
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git97 as of Feb 07 2022


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3323 as of May 9 2022, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc25), Single-Server Edition (61 GB total memory, 43 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2022 OpenLink Software