About: Teague v. Lane     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FTeague_v._Lane

Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the application of newly announced rules of law in habeas corpus proceedings. This case addresses the Federal Court's threshold standard of deciding whether Constitutional claims will be heard. Application of the "Teague test" at the most basic level limits habeas corpus.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Teague v. Lane (en)
rdfs:comment
  • Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the application of newly announced rules of law in habeas corpus proceedings. This case addresses the Federal Court's threshold standard of deciding whether Constitutional claims will be heard. Application of the "Teague test" at the most basic level limits habeas corpus. (en)
foaf:name
  • Frank Teague v. Michael P. Lane (Director of Illinois Department of Corrections) and Michael O'Leary (Warden of Stateville Correctional Center) (en)
dcterms:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
sameAs
Subsequent
  • None (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
Dissent
  • Brennan (en)
JoinDissent
  • Marshall (en)
JoinMajority
  • Rehnquist, White, Scalia and Kennedy ; Blackmun, Stevens (en)
oyez
ParallelCitations
Prior
USPage
USVol
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
  • Teague v. Lane, (en)
DecideDate
DecideYear
fullname
  • Frank Teague v. Michael P. Lane and Michael O'Leary (en)
Holding
  • In habeas corpus proceedings, only a limited set of important substantive or procedural rights will be enforced retroactively or announced prospectively. (en)
justia
Litigants
  • Teague v. Lane (en)
majority
  • O'Connor (en)
loc
has abstract
  • Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the application of newly announced rules of law in habeas corpus proceedings. This case addresses the Federal Court's threshold standard of deciding whether Constitutional claims will be heard. Application of the "Teague test" at the most basic level limits habeas corpus. (en)
Concurrence
  • White (en)
  • Stevens (en)
  • Blackmun (en)
JoinConcurrence
  • Blackmun (en)
JoinPlurality
  • Rehnquist, Scalia, Kennedy (en)
Overruled
  • Edwards v. Vannoy (en)
Plurality
  • O'Connor (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom
page length (characters) of wiki page
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 51 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software