• Facets (new session)
• Description
• Metadata
• Settings
  • Rule: ActivityStreamsMapasEquivalentb3sb3sifpdbprdf-labelfacetshttp://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/dbpedia#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/opencyc#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/umbel#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/yago#http://dbpedia.org/schema/property_rules#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/SUMO#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/WordNet#http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ldpoplwebskos-transurn:det:rdf:labelvirtrdf-labelvirtrdf-urlNone
    
  • Inverse Functional Properties: Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects
  • "Same As": Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects (recommended) Apply to subjects, objects and predicates (not recommended on big datasets) Apply to predicates only (special use cases only)

About: Damages (Jewish law)     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:WikicatRabbinicLegalTextsAndResponsa, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)

Type: yago:Abstraction100002137yago:Act100030358yago:Assembly108163792yago:Communication100033020yago:Court108329453yago:Event100029378yago:Gathering107975026yago:Group100031264yago:GroupAction101080366yago:Matter106365467yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100yago:Punishment101160342yago:WikicatJewishCourtsAndCivilLawyago:Writing106362953yago:WrittenCommunication106349220yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntityyago:SocialControl101123598yago:SocialGroup107950920yago:Text106387980yago:WikicatPunishmentsInReligionyago:WikicatRabbinicLegalTextsAndResponsa New Facet based on Instances of this Class

In Jewish law, damages (Hebrew: נזיקין, nezikin) covers a range of jurisprudential topics that roughly correspond in secular law to torts. Jewish law on damages is grounded partly on the Written Torah, the Hebrew Bible, and partly on the Oral Torah, centered primarily in the Mishnaic Order of Nezikin. Since at least of the time of the Mishnah, Rabbinic culture developed and interpreted the laws of damages through communal courts, judges, and enforcement. While Jewish communities exercised relatively little authority over criminal law in the diaspora, quasi-autonomous communal oversight of damages (tort law) continued to be extensive until the modern era. Jews continue to this day to voluntarily submit themselves to adjudication of damages disputes by rabbinic judges and courts (beit din).