About: Sweezy v. New Hampshire

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U.S. 234 (1957), was a case before the United States Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that jailing an academic when he refused to answer questions about university lectures he had given was a violation of due process. On a larger scale, the decision established constitutional protections for academic freedom and reined in the investigative powers of state legislatures. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep354/usrep354234/usrep354234.pdf http://unhmagazine.unh.edu/f01/daggett1f01.html https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/354/234.html https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=10026374859124601238 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/354/234/ https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/105533/sweezy-v-new-hampshire/ https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/354/234 https://www.leagle.com/decision/1957588354us2341580 https://www.oyez.org/cases/1956/175
dbo:wikiPageID	57676500 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	18399 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1117189221 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_involving_the_First_Amendment dbr:Merrimack_County,_New_Hampshire dbc:Anti-communism_in_the_United_States dbr:Paul_Sweezy dbr:Pennsylvania_v._Nelson dbr:United_States_Congress dbr:United_States_Supreme_Court dbr:University_of_New_Hampshire dbr:Due_Process_Clause dbr:Due_process dbr:LexisNexis dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Communist dbr:Contempt_of_court dbr:Monthly_Review dbr:The_New_York_Times dbc:University_of_New_Hampshire dbr:Louis_C._Wyman dbr:Subversion dbc:United_States_due_process_case_law dbr:Tom_C._Clark dbr:Watkins_v._United_States dbr:Willard_Uphaus dbr:Lawyers'_Edition dbr:Earl_Warren dbr:Felix_Frankfurter dbr:Florence_Luscomb dbr:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbc:1957_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Government_interest dbr:Harold_Hitz_Burton dbr:Harvard_Law_School dbr:Atlantic_Reporter dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Warren_Court dbr:Academic_freedom dbc:Academic_freedom dbr:Charles_Evans_Whittaker dbr:Keyishian_v._Board_of_Regents dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Dialectical_materialism dbr:Marxism dbr:Socialist dbr:National_Association_of_Attorneys_General dbr:New_Hampshire dbr:New_Hampshire_Attorney_General dbr:New_Hampshire_General_Court dbr:New_Hampshire_Supreme_Court dbr:Certiorari dbr:Yates_v._United_States dbr:Socialist_Union_of_America dbr:World_Fellowship_Center dbr:John_Marshall_Harlan_(born_1899) dbr:Merrimack_County dbr:Amendment_I
dbp:arguedate	0001-03-05 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear	1957 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case	Sweezy v. New Hampshire, (en)
dbp:concurrence	Frankfurter (en)
dbp:cornell	https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/354/234
dbp:courtlistener	https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/105533/sweezy-v-new-hampshire/
dbp:decidedate	0001-06-17 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear	1957 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent	Clark (en)
dbp:findlaw	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/354/234.html
dbp:fullname	Paul M. Sweezy v. State of New Hampshire by Louis C. Wyman, Attorney General (en)
dbp:googlescholar	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=10026374859124601238
dbp:holding	Due to the unknown government interest into Sweezy's lectures and the lack of legislative oversight of the investigation, appellant's conviction violated his right to due process. (en)
dbp:joinconcurrence	Harlan (en)
dbp:joindissent	Burton (en)
dbp:joinplurality	Black, Douglas, Brennan (en)
dbp:justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/354/234/
dbp:lawsapplied	dbr:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Amendment_I
dbp:leagle	https://www.leagle.com/decision/1957588354us2341580
dbp:litigants	Sweezy v. New Hampshire (en)
dbp:loc	http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep354/usrep354234/usrep354234.pdf
dbp:notparticipating	Whittaker (en)
dbp:oralargument	https://www.oyez.org/cases/1956/175
dbp:oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/1956/175
dbp:parallelcitations	172800.0
dbp:plurality	Warren (en)
dbp:prior	172800.0
dbp:subsequent	Remanded to the New Hampshire Supreme Court; petition for rehearing denied, . (en)
dbp:uspage	234 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol	354 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Wikisource dbt:Ussc
dcterms:subject	dbc:Anti-communism_in_the_United_States dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:University_of_New_Hampshire dbc:United_States_due_process_case_law dbc:1957_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Warren_Court dbc:Academic_freedom
rdf:type	owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:comment	Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U.S. 234 (1957), was a case before the United States Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that jailing an academic when he refused to answer questions about university lectures he had given was a violation of due process. On a larger scale, the decision established constitutional protections for academic freedom and reined in the investigative powers of state legislatures. (en)
rdfs:label	Sweezy v. New Hampshire (en)
owl:sameAs	wikidata:Sweezy v. New Hampshire https://global.dbpedia.org/id/peHv
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Sweezy_v._New_Hampshire?oldid=1117189221&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Sweezy_v._New_Hampshire
foaf:name	(en) Paul M. Sweezy v. State of New Hampshire by Louis C. Wyman, Attorney General (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:Sweezy_v_New_Hampshire
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_involving_the_First_Amendment dbr:Paul_Sweezy dbr:Thomas_I._Emerson dbr:Louis_C._Wyman dbr:Sweezy_v_New_Hampshire dbr:Academic_freedom dbr:Yates_v._United_States
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Sweezy_v._New_Hampshire