An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, 572 U.S. 291 (2014), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States concerning affirmative action and race- and sex-based discrimination in public university admissions. In a 6-2 decision, the Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause does not prevent states from enacting bans on affirmative action in education.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, 572 U.S. 291 (2014), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States concerning affirmative action and race- and sex-based discrimination in public university admissions. In a 6-2 decision, the Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause does not prevent states from enacting bans on affirmative action in education. The case arose after Michigan voters approved the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative, which amended the state constitution to make affirmative action illegal in public employment and public education. In a plurality opinion joined by two other justices, Justice Anthony Kennedy held that the ban on affirmative action was constitutional. Kennedy wrote that "[t]here is no authority in the Constitution of the United States or in this Court's precedents for the Judiciary to set aside Michigan laws that commit this policy determination to the voters." Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Stephen Breyer concurred in the result but filed or joined separate opinions. In her dissenting opinion, Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that the voters of Michigan had "changed the basic rules of the political process in that State in a manner that uniquely disadvantaged racial minorities." (en)
  • シュッテ対アファーマティブ・アクション防護連合事件(シュッテたいアファーマティブアクションぼうごれんごうじけん、Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action)572 U.S. 291 (2014)は、大学受験において人種や性別を考慮して差別是正措置を行うことを公立大学に対し禁じることを定めた州憲法は、アメリカ合衆国憲法修正第14条の平等保護条項に違反しているかどうかをアメリカ合衆国連邦最高裁判所が判断した事件。 この事件は、2006年に州の住民投票によって成立した、アファーマティブ・アクションを禁じることを定めたミシガン州憲法は違憲であると2012年に判決した第6巡回区控訴裁判所の上告審として、2013年10月15日に審理された。アメリカ合衆国連邦最高裁判所は、巡回区控訴裁判所の判決を逆転させ、ミシガン州憲法を支持する判決を出した。 (ja)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 42556792 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 12524 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1110068608 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-10-15 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 2013 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Roberts (en)
  • Breyer (en)
  • Scalia (en)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-04-22 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 2014 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Sotomayor (en)
dbp:docket
  • 12 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • Schuette, Attorney General of Michigan v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration and Immigration Rights and Fight for Equality By Any Means Necessary (BAMN) et al. (en)
dbp:holding
  • Michigan's Proposal 2, banning race-based affirmative action in state universities, does not violate the Equal Protection Clause. (en)
dbp:joinconcurrence
  • Thomas (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • Ginsburg (en)
dbp:joinplurality
  • Roberts, Alito (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action (en)
dbp:notparticipating
  • Kagan (en)
dbp:oralargument
dbp:otherSource
  • Supreme Court (en)
dbp:otherUrl
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:plurality
  • Kennedy (en)
dbp:prior
  • 25920.0
dbp:uspage
  • 291 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 572 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • シュッテ対アファーマティブ・アクション防護連合事件(シュッテたいアファーマティブアクションぼうごれんごうじけん、Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action)572 U.S. 291 (2014)は、大学受験において人種や性別を考慮して差別是正措置を行うことを公立大学に対し禁じることを定めた州憲法は、アメリカ合衆国憲法修正第14条の平等保護条項に違反しているかどうかをアメリカ合衆国連邦最高裁判所が判断した事件。 この事件は、2006年に州の住民投票によって成立した、アファーマティブ・アクションを禁じることを定めたミシガン州憲法は違憲であると2012年に判決した第6巡回区控訴裁判所の上告審として、2013年10月15日に審理された。アメリカ合衆国連邦最高裁判所は、巡回区控訴裁判所の判決を逆転させ、ミシガン州憲法を支持する判決を出した。 (ja)
  • Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, 572 U.S. 291 (2014), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States concerning affirmative action and race- and sex-based discrimination in public university admissions. In a 6-2 decision, the Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause does not prevent states from enacting bans on affirmative action in education. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action (en)
  • シュッテ対アファーマティブ・アクション防護連合事件 (ja)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Schuette,Attorney General of Michiganv.Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration and Immigration Rights and Fight for Equality By Any Means Necessary (BAMN)et al. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is rdfs:seeAlso of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License