| dbo:abstract
|
- Patchak v. Zinke, 583 U.S. ___ (2018), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the Gun Lake Trust Land Reaffirmation Act, which precludes federal courts from hearing lawsuits involving a particular parcel of land. Although six Justices agreed that the Gun Lake Act was constitutional, they could not agree on why. In an opinion issued by Justice Thomas, a plurality of the Court read the statute to strip federal courts of jurisdiction over cases involving the property and held that this did not violate Article III of the U.S. Constitution. In contrast, Justices Ginsburg and Sotomayor, both of whom concurred in the judgment, upheld the Act as a restoration of the government's sovereign immunity. Chief Justice Roberts, writing for himself and Justices Kennedy and Gorsuch, dissented on the ground that the statute intruded on the judicial power, in violation of Article III. (en)
|
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 27781 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-11-07 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:case
| |
| dbp:concurrence
|
- Sotomayor (en)
- Breyer (en)
- Ginsburg (en)
|
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-02-27 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:dissent
| |
| dbp:docket
| |
| dbp:first
|
- Note (en)
- Evan C. (en)
- Note, Michael (en)
|
| dbp:fullname
|
- David Patchak, Petitioner v. Ryan Zinke, Secretary of the Interior (en)
|
| dbp:joinconcurrence
| |
| dbp:joindissent
| |
| dbp:joinplurality
|
- Breyer, Alito, Kagan (en)
|
| dbp:journal
| |
| dbp:justia
| |
| dbp:last
| |
| dbp:litigants
| |
| dbp:oralargument
| |
| dbp:otherSource
|
- Supreme Court (en)
- Google Scholar (en)
|
| dbp:otherUrl
| |
| dbp:oyez
| |
| dbp:page
|
- 85 (xsd:integer)
- 135 (xsd:integer)
- 297 (xsd:integer)
|
| dbp:parallelcitations
| |
| dbp:plurality
| |
| dbp:prior
| |
| dbp:title
|
- Patchak v. Zinke, Separation of Powers, and the Pitfalls of Form over Substance (en)
- Is the Federal Judiciary Independent of Congress? (en)
- The Supreme Court, 2017 Term — Leading Cases (en)
|
| dbp:url
|
- https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1167&context=djclpp_sidebar| year=2018 (en)
- https://review.law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2018/02/70-Stan.-L.-Rev.-Online-135-Zoldan.pdf| year=2018 (en)
- https://harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/297-306_Online.pdf| year=2018 (en)
|
| dbp:uspage
| |
| dbp:usvol
| |
| dbp:volume
|
- 13 (xsd:integer)
- 70 (xsd:integer)
- 132 (xsd:integer)
|
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Patchak v. Zinke, 583 U.S. ___ (2018), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the Gun Lake Trust Land Reaffirmation Act, which precludes federal courts from hearing lawsuits involving a particular parcel of land. Although six Justices agreed that the Gun Lake Act was constitutional, they could not agree on why. In an opinion issued by Justice Thomas, a plurality of the Court read the statute to strip federal courts of jurisdiction over cases involving the property and held that this did not violate Article III of the U.S. Constitution. In contrast, Justices Ginsburg and Sotomayor, both of whom concurred in the judgment, upheld the Act as a restoration of the government's sovereign immunity. Chief Justice Roberts, writing for himself and Justices Kennedy and Gorsuch (en)
|
| rdfs:label
| |
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| foaf:name
|
- David Patchak, Petitioner v. Ryan Zinke, Secretary of the Interior (en)
|
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is dbp:scotusCases
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
