| dbo:abstract
|
- Packingham v. North Carolina ist ein Gerichtsfall vor dem Obersten Gerichtshof der Vereinigten Staaten, der im Jahre 2017 entschieden wurde. In diesem Fall wurde zum ersten Mal die Frage erörtert, ob soziale Medien wie Facebook als öffentliche Räume anzusehen sind, und ob der Zugang dazu gesetzlich verboten werden kann. Gemäß Richter Anthony Kennedy handelt es sich um einen der ersten Fälle, in welchem der Supreme Court das Verhältnis zwischen der Rede- und Pressefreiheit und dem Internet erörtern musste. (de)
- Packingham v. North Carolina, 582 U.S. ___ (2017), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a North Carolina statute that prohibited registered sex offenders from using social media websites is unconstitutional because it violates the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which protects the freedom of speech. In 2010, Lester Gerard Packingham, a registered sex offender, posted on Facebook under a pseudonym to comment favorably on a recent traffic court experience. Packingham was then identified by police and charged with violating North Carolina's law. Packingham moved to dismiss the charges, arguing that the state's law violated the First Amendment. The trial court dismissed this motion and ultimately convicted Packingham. An appellate court initially reversed the trial court, holding that the law did violate the First Amendment, but the North Carolina Supreme Court, the state's highest court, disagreed and reinstated the conviction. In June 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously reversed the North Carolina Supreme Court's judgment. In a majority opinion authored by Justice Anthony Kennedy, the Court held that social media—defined broadly enough to include Facebook, Amazon.com, The Washington Post, and WebMD—is considered a "protected space" under the First Amendment for lawful speech. The Court offered that North Carolina could protect children through less restrictive means, such as prohibiting "conduct that often presages a sexual crime, like contacting a minor or using a website to gather information about a minor". (en)
- パッキンガム対ノースカロライナ州事件（パッキンガムたいノースカロライナしゅうじけん、Packingham v. North Carolina）582 U.S. ___ (2017)は、性犯罪の前歴を持つ者がソーシャルメディアウェブサイトにアクセスすることを禁止したノースカロライナ州の法律は、アメリカ合衆国憲法修正第1条に反しており違憲であると判示した合衆国最高裁判所の判決。 (ja)
|
| dbo:thumbnail
| |
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 18528 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-02-27 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:case
|
- Packingham v. North Carolina, 582 U.S. ___ (en)
|
| dbp:concurrence
| |
| dbp:cornell
| |
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-06-19 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:docket
| |
| dbp:findlaw
| |
| dbp:fullname
|
- Lester Gerard Packingham, Petitioner v. North Carolina (en)
|
| dbp:holding
|
- A statute prohibiting registered sex offenders from accessing social media websites impermissibly restricts lawful speech in violation of the First Amendment. (en)
|
| dbp:joinconcurrence
| |
| dbp:joinmajority
|
- Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan (en)
|
| dbp:justia
| |
| dbp:lawsapplied
| |
| dbp:litigants
|
- Packingham v. North Carolina (en)
|
| dbp:majority
| |
| dbp:notparticipating
| |
| dbp:opinionannouncement
| |
| dbp:oralargument
| |
| dbp:otherSource
| |
| dbp:otherUrl
| |
| dbp:oyez
| |
| dbp:parallelcitations
| |
| dbp:prior
| |
| dbp:uspage
| |
| dbp:usvol
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Packingham v. North Carolina ist ein Gerichtsfall vor dem Obersten Gerichtshof der Vereinigten Staaten, der im Jahre 2017 entschieden wurde. In diesem Fall wurde zum ersten Mal die Frage erörtert, ob soziale Medien wie Facebook als öffentliche Räume anzusehen sind, und ob der Zugang dazu gesetzlich verboten werden kann. Gemäß Richter Anthony Kennedy handelt es sich um einen der ersten Fälle, in welchem der Supreme Court das Verhältnis zwischen der Rede- und Pressefreiheit und dem Internet erörtern musste. (de)
- パッキンガム対ノースカロライナ州事件（パッキンガムたいノースカロライナしゅうじけん、Packingham v. North Carolina）582 U.S. ___ (2017)は、性犯罪の前歴を持つ者がソーシャルメディアウェブサイトにアクセスすることを禁止したノースカロライナ州の法律は、アメリカ合衆国憲法修正第1条に反しており違憲であると判示した合衆国最高裁判所の判決。 (ja)
- Packingham v. North Carolina, 582 U.S. ___ (2017), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a North Carolina statute that prohibited registered sex offenders from using social media websites is unconstitutional because it violates the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which protects the freedom of speech. (en)
|
| rdfs:label
|
- Packingham v. North Carolina (en)
- Packingham v. North Carolina (de)
- パッキンガム対ノースカロライナ州事件 (ja)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:depiction
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Lester Gerard Packingham, Petitioner v. North Carolina (en)
|
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
