An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, 572 U.S. 185 (2014), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court on campaign finance. The decision held that Section 441 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, which imposed a limit on contributions an individual can make over a two-year period to all national party and federal candidate committees, is unconstitutional.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, 572 U.S. 185 (2014), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court on campaign finance. The decision held that Section 441 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, which imposed a limit on contributions an individual can make over a two-year period to all national party and federal candidate committees, is unconstitutional. The case was argued before the Supreme Court on October 8, 2013, being brought on appeal after the United States District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed the challenge. It was decided on April 2, 2014, by a 5–4 vote, reversing the decision below and remanding. Justices Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, and Alito invalidated "aggregate contribution limits" (amounts one can contribute over the two-year period) as violating the First Amendment. Justice Thomas provided the necessary fifth vote but concurred separately in the judgment, while arguing that all contribution limits are unconstitutional. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 40389521 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 26410 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1100036120 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-10-08 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 2013 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • McCutcheon v. FEC, (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Thomas (en)
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-04-02 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 2014 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Breyer (en)
dbp:docket
  • 12 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • Shaun McCutcheon, et al., Appellants v. Federal Election Commission (en)
dbp:holding
  • Limitations on aggregate contributions to campaign finances violate the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Section 441 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 is unconstitutional. (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan (en)
dbp:joinplurality
  • Scalia, Kennedy, Alito (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission (en)
dbp:oralargument
dbp:otherSource
  • Supreme Court (en)
dbp:otherUrl
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:plurality
  • Roberts (en)
dbp:prior
  • 172800.0
dbp:uspage
  • 185 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 572 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, 572 U.S. 185 (2014), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court on campaign finance. The decision held that Section 441 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, which imposed a limit on contributions an individual can make over a two-year period to all national party and federal candidate committees, is unconstitutional. (en)
rdfs:label
  • McCutcheon v. FEC (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Shaun McCutcheon, et al., Appellants v. Federal Election Commission (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License