An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

LabCorp v. Metabolite, Inc., 548 U.S. 124 (2006), is the first case since Diamond v. Chakrabarty in which the U.S. Supreme Court indicated a renewed interest in examining the limits of patentable subject matter for advances in life sciences. Although the Court initially agreed to hear the case, it was later dismissed in 2006 with three Justices dissenting. The defendant's petition to the Supreme Court raised an issue not addressed in opinions from the lower courts: the claim at issue was directed to patent ineligible subject matter and therefore invalid.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • LabCorp v. Metabolite, Inc., 548 U.S. 124 (2006), is the first case since Diamond v. Chakrabarty in which the U.S. Supreme Court indicated a renewed interest in examining the limits of patentable subject matter for advances in life sciences. Although the Court initially agreed to hear the case, it was later dismissed in 2006 with three Justices dissenting. The defendant's petition to the Supreme Court raised an issue not addressed in opinions from the lower courts: the claim at issue was directed to patent ineligible subject matter and therefore invalid. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 8383045 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 7023 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 948442577 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-03-21 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 2006 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • LabCorp v. Metabolite, Inc., (en)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-06-22 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 2006 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Breyer (en)
dbp:docket
  • 3 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings v. Metabolite Laboratories, Inc. et al. (en)
dbp:holding
  • Writ of certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted. (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • Souter, Stevens (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:litigants
  • LabCorp of Am. Holdings v. Metabolite Labs., Inc. (en)
dbp:opinionannouncement
dbp:oralargument
dbp:otherSource
  • Supreme Court (en)
dbp:otherUrl
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 17280.0
dbp:percuriam
  • yes (en)
dbp:prior
  • 25920.0
dbp:subsequent
  • 25920.0
dbp:uspage
  • 124 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 548 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • LabCorp v. Metabolite, Inc., 548 U.S. 124 (2006), is the first case since Diamond v. Chakrabarty in which the U.S. Supreme Court indicated a renewed interest in examining the limits of patentable subject matter for advances in life sciences. Although the Court initially agreed to hear the case, it was later dismissed in 2006 with three Justices dissenting. The defendant's petition to the Supreme Court raised an issue not addressed in opinions from the lower courts: the claim at issue was directed to patent ineligible subject matter and therefore invalid. (en)
rdfs:label
  • LabCorp v. Metabolite, Inc. (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (d/b/a LabCorp) v. Metabolite Laboratories, Inc. et al. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License