| dbo:abstract
|
- Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with whether living organisms can be patented. Writing for a five-justice majority, Chief Justice Warren E. Burger held that human-made bacteria could be patented under the patent laws of the United States because such an invention constituted a "manufacture" or "composition of matter". Justice William J. Brennan Jr., along with Justices Byron White, Thurgood Marshall, and Lewis F. Powell Jr., dissented from the Court's ruling, arguing that because Congress had not expressly authorized the patenting of biological organisms, the Court should not extend patent law to cover them. In the decades since the Court's ruling, the case has been recognized as a landmark case for U.S. patent law, with industry and legal commentators identifying it as a turning point for the biotechnology industry. (en)
- L'arrêt Diamond c. Chakrabarty (447 U.S. 303, 1980) de la Cour suprême des États-Unis entérine la brevetabilité du vivant, en l'espèce d'une bactérie génétiquement modifiée. (fr)
- Sidney A. Diamond contro Ananda Mohan Chakrabarty (1980) fu la sentenza con cui la Corte suprema degli Stati Uniti diede per la prima volta il permesso di brevettare organismi geneticamente modificati. (it)
- 戴蒙德诉查克拉巴蒂案（Diamond v. Chakrabarty）， U.S. 303 (1980)是美国联邦最高法院判决的一个案件，裁定转基因生物可被授予专利。 (zh)
|
| dbo:thumbnail
| |
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 14543 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-03-17 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:case
|
- Diamond v. Chakrabarty, (en)
|
| dbp:courtlistener
| |
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-06-16 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:dissent
| |
| dbp:findlaw
| |
| dbp:fullname
|
- Sidney A. Diamond, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, v. Ananda M. Chakrabarty, et al. (en)
|
| dbp:googlescholar
| |
| dbp:holding
|
- Living, man-made micro-organism is patentable subject matter as a "manufacture" or "composition of matter" within the meaning of the Patent Act of 1952. The fact that the organism sought to be patented is alive is no bar to patentability. Decision of the Court of Customs & Patent Appeals affirmed. (en)
|
| dbp:joindissent
|
- White, Marshall, Powell (en)
|
| dbp:joinmajority
|
- Stewart, Blackmun, Rehnquist, Stevens (en)
|
| dbp:justia
| |
| dbp:lawsapplied
|
- Patent Act of 1952, specifically 35 U.S.C. § 101 (en)
|
| dbp:litigants
|
- Diamond v. Chakrabarty (en)
|
| dbp:majority
| |
| dbp:oyez
| |
| dbp:parallelcitations
| |
| dbp:prior
| |
| dbp:uspage
| |
| dbp:usvol
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- L'arrêt Diamond c. Chakrabarty (447 U.S. 303, 1980) de la Cour suprême des États-Unis entérine la brevetabilité du vivant, en l'espèce d'une bactérie génétiquement modifiée. (fr)
- Sidney A. Diamond contro Ananda Mohan Chakrabarty (1980) fu la sentenza con cui la Corte suprema degli Stati Uniti diede per la prima volta il permesso di brevettare organismi geneticamente modificati. (it)
- 戴蒙德诉查克拉巴蒂案（Diamond v. Chakrabarty）， U.S. 303 (1980)是美国联邦最高法院判决的一个案件，裁定转基因生物可被授予专利。 (zh)
- Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with whether living organisms can be patented. Writing for a five-justice majority, Chief Justice Warren E. Burger held that human-made bacteria could be patented under the patent laws of the United States because such an invention constituted a "manufacture" or "composition of matter". Justice William J. Brennan Jr., along with Justices Byron White, Thurgood Marshall, and Lewis F. Powell Jr., dissented from the Court's ruling, arguing that because Congress had not expressly authorized the patenting of biological organisms, the Court should not extend patent law to cover them. (en)
|
| rdfs:label
|
- Diamond v. Chakrabarty (en)
- Diamond v. Chakrabarty (fr)
- Diamond contro Chakrabarty (it)
- 戴蒙德诉查克拉巴蒂案 (zh)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:depiction
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Sidney A. Diamond, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, v. Ananda M. Chakrabarty, et al. (en)
|
| is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
