An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Guinn v. United States, 238 U.S. 347 (1915), was a United States Supreme Court decision that found certain grandfather clause exemptions to literacy tests for voting rights to be unconstitutional. Though these grandfather clauses were superficially race-neutral, they were designed to protect the voting rights of illiterate white voters while disenfranchising black voters.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Guinn v. United States, 238 U.S. 347 (1915), was a United States Supreme Court decision that found certain grandfather clause exemptions to literacy tests for voting rights to be unconstitutional. Though these grandfather clauses were superficially race-neutral, they were designed to protect the voting rights of illiterate white voters while disenfranchising black voters. The 1870 ratification of the Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution barred each state from denying the right to vote on the basis of "race, color, or previous condition of servitude". In response, several Southern states, including Oklahoma, established constitutional provisions designed to effectively disenfranchise African-American voters without explicitly violating the Fifteenth Amendment. In his majority opinion, Chief Justice Edward Douglass White held that Oklahoma's grandfather clause was "repugnant to the Fifteenth Amendment and therefore null and void". The decision had little immediate impact, as Southern legislatures found other methods to disenfranchise blacks. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 168888 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 13474 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1118829715 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-10-17 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1913 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Guinn v. United States, (en)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-06-21 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1915 (xsd:integer)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • Frank Guinn and J. J. Beal v. United States (en)
dbp:holding
  • A state statute drafted in such a way as to serve no rational purpose other than to disadvantage the right of African-American citizens to vote violated the 15th Amendment. (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • McKenna, Holmes, Day, Hughes, Van Devanter, Lamar, Pitney (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • Guinn v. United States (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • White (en)
dbp:notparticipating
  • McReynolds (en)
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 35 (xsd:integer)
dbp:prior
  • Certificate from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (en)
dbp:uspage
  • 347 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 238 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Guinn v. United States, 238 U.S. 347 (1915), was a United States Supreme Court decision that found certain grandfather clause exemptions to literacy tests for voting rights to be unconstitutional. Though these grandfather clauses were superficially race-neutral, they were designed to protect the voting rights of illiterate white voters while disenfranchising black voters. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Guinn v. United States (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Frank Guinn and J. J. Beal v. United States (en)
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License