| dbo:abstract
|
- Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision involving First Amendment free speech protections for government employees. The plaintiff in the case was a district attorney who claimed that he had been passed up for a promotion for criticizing the legitimacy of a warrant. The Court ruled, in a 5–4 decision, that because his statements were made pursuant to his position as a public employee, rather than as a private citizen, his speech had no First Amendment protection. (en)
|
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 24844 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-10-12 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:case
|
- Garcetti v. Ceballos, (en)
|
| dbp:courtlistener
| |
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-05-30 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:dissent
|
- Souter (en)
- Stevens (en)
- Breyer (en)
|
| dbp:docket
| |
| dbp:findlaw
| |
| dbp:fullname
|
- Gil Garcetti, Frank Sundstedt, Carol Najera, and County of Los Angeles v. Richard Ceballos (en)
|
| dbp:googlescholar
| |
| dbp:holding
|
- Statements made by public employees pursuant to their official duties are not protected by the First Amendment from employer discipline. (en)
|
| dbp:joindissent
| |
| dbp:joinmajority
|
- Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Alito (en)
|
| dbp:justia
| |
| dbp:lawsapplied
| |
| dbp:litigants
|
- Garcetti v. Ceballos (en)
|
| dbp:majority
| |
| dbp:oralargument
| |
| dbp:otherSource
| |
| dbp:otherUrl
| |
| dbp:oyez
| |
| dbp:parallelcitations
| |
| dbp:prior
| |
| dbp:rearguedate
|
- 0001-03-21 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:reargueyear
| |
| dbp:uspage
| |
| dbp:usvol
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision involving First Amendment free speech protections for government employees. The plaintiff in the case was a district attorney who claimed that he had been passed up for a promotion for criticizing the legitimacy of a warrant. The Court ruled, in a 5–4 decision, that because his statements were made pursuant to his position as a public employee, rather than as a private citizen, his speech had no First Amendment protection. (en)
|
| rdfs:label
|
- Garcetti v. Ceballos (en)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Gil Garcetti, Frank Sundstedt, Carol Najera, and County of Los Angeles v. Richard Ceballos (en)
|
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
