An Entity of Type: WikicatCriticisms, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Evolutionary psychology seeks to identify and understand human psychological traits that have evolved in much the same way as biological traits, through adaptation to environmental cues. Furthermore, it tends toward viewing the vast majority of psychological traits, certainly the most important ones, as the result of past adaptions, which has generated significant controversy and criticism from competing fields. These criticisms include disputes about the testability of evolutionary hypotheses, cognitive assumptions such as massive modularity, vagueness stemming from assumptions about the environment that leads to evolutionary adaptation, the importance of non-genetic and non-adaptive explanations, as well as political and ethical issues in the field itself.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Evolutionary psychology seeks to identify and understand human psychological traits that have evolved in much the same way as biological traits, through adaptation to environmental cues. Furthermore, it tends toward viewing the vast majority of psychological traits, certainly the most important ones, as the result of past adaptions, which has generated significant controversy and criticism from competing fields. These criticisms include disputes about the testability of evolutionary hypotheses, cognitive assumptions such as massive modularity, vagueness stemming from assumptions about the environment that leads to evolutionary adaptation, the importance of non-genetic and non-adaptive explanations, as well as political and ethical issues in the field itself. Evolutionary psychologists contend the criticisms against it are straw men, based on an incorrect nature versus nurture dichotomy, and/or based on misunderstandings of the discipline. (en)
  • 進化心理学への批判(しんかしんりがくへのひはん)では進化心理学にまつわる論争や批判について述べる。進化心理学は、生物学的形質と同じく環境要因への適応を通して進化してきたヒトの心理学的形質について理解を進めようとする分野である。進化心理学はヒトの心理的な特徴を、特に重要なものを含めて大部分が適応の結果だとみなすことで、多くの論争と批判を対立する分野に生み出してきた。批判には、進化論的仮説の検証可能性に関する論争、進化心理学で頻繁に使用されるいくつかの認知に関する仮定(大規模な心のモジュール性など)への懐疑、進化適応環境の不確実性に起因する曖昧さの主張、非遺伝的・非適応的説明の重要性、および進化心理学の分野が持つ政治的・倫理的問題が含まれる。 進化心理学者は、進化心理学に対する批判は藁人形論法を含み、の誤った二分法に基づいており、さらには理論への誤解に基づいているとして争ってきた 。 (ja)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 12102147 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 100689 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1118195143 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • 進化心理学への批判(しんかしんりがくへのひはん)では進化心理学にまつわる論争や批判について述べる。進化心理学は、生物学的形質と同じく環境要因への適応を通して進化してきたヒトの心理学的形質について理解を進めようとする分野である。進化心理学はヒトの心理的な特徴を、特に重要なものを含めて大部分が適応の結果だとみなすことで、多くの論争と批判を対立する分野に生み出してきた。批判には、進化論的仮説の検証可能性に関する論争、進化心理学で頻繁に使用されるいくつかの認知に関する仮定(大規模な心のモジュール性など)への懐疑、進化適応環境の不確実性に起因する曖昧さの主張、非遺伝的・非適応的説明の重要性、および進化心理学の分野が持つ政治的・倫理的問題が含まれる。 進化心理学者は、進化心理学に対する批判は藁人形論法を含み、の誤った二分法に基づいており、さらには理論への誤解に基づいているとして争ってきた 。 (ja)
  • Evolutionary psychology seeks to identify and understand human psychological traits that have evolved in much the same way as biological traits, through adaptation to environmental cues. Furthermore, it tends toward viewing the vast majority of psychological traits, certainly the most important ones, as the result of past adaptions, which has generated significant controversy and criticism from competing fields. These criticisms include disputes about the testability of evolutionary hypotheses, cognitive assumptions such as massive modularity, vagueness stemming from assumptions about the environment that leads to evolutionary adaptation, the importance of non-genetic and non-adaptive explanations, as well as political and ethical issues in the field itself. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Criticism of evolutionary psychology (en)
  • 進化心理学への批判 (ja)
rdfs:seeAlso
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:mainInterest of
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is dbp:mainInterests of
is rdfs:seeAlso of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License