| dbo:abstract
|
- Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee, 594 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case related to voting rights established by the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), and specifically the applicability of Section 2's general provision barring discrimination against minorities in state and local election laws in the wake of the 2013 Supreme Court decision Shelby County v. Holder, which removed the preclearance requirements for election laws for certain states that had been set by Sections 4(b) and 5. Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee involves two of Arizona's election policies: one outlawing ballot collection and another banning out-of-precinct voting. The Supreme Court ruled in a 6–3 decision in July 2021 that neither of Arizona's election policies violated the VRA or had a racially discriminatory purpose. (en)
|
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 34867 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-03-02 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:case
|
- Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee, (en)
|
| dbp:concurrence
| |
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-07-01 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:dissent
| |
| dbp:docket
| |
| dbp:fullname
|
- Arizona Republican Party, et al. v. Democratic National Committee, et al. (en)
- Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al. v. Democratic National Committee, et al. (en)
|
| dbp:holding
|
- Neither Arizona’s out-of-precinct policy nor HB 2023 violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and HB 2023 was not enacted with a racially discriminatory purpose in mind. (en)
|
| dbp:joinconcurrence
| |
| dbp:joindissent
| |
| dbp:joinmajority
|
- Roberts, Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett (en)
|
| dbp:justia
| |
| dbp:lawsapplied
| |
| dbp:litigants
|
- Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee (en)
- Arizona Republican Party v. Democratic National Committee (en)
|
| dbp:majority
| |
| dbp:otherSource
| |
| dbp:otherUrl
| |
| dbp:oyez
| |
| dbp:prior
|
- * No. 2:16-cv-01065-DLR, motion denied
* No. 16-16698, motion denied,
* No. 16-16698, motion granted
* No. 16A460, motion stayed
* No. CV-16-01065-PHX-DLR, judgement granted
* No. 18-15845, affirmed
* No. 18-15845, vacated and reversed (en)
|
| dbp:uspage
| |
| dbp:usvol
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee, 594 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case related to voting rights established by the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), and specifically the applicability of Section 2's general provision barring discrimination against minorities in state and local election laws in the wake of the 2013 Supreme Court decision Shelby County v. Holder, which removed the preclearance requirements for election laws for certain states that had been set by Sections 4(b) and 5. Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee involves two of Arizona's election policies: one outlawing ballot collection and another banning out-of-precinct voting. The Supreme Court ruled in a 6–3 decision in July 2021 that neither of Arizona's election policies violated the VRA or (en)
|
| rdfs:label
|
- Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee (en)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| foaf:name
|
- Arizona Republican Party, et al. v. Democratic National Committee, et al. (en)
- Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al. v. Democratic National Committee, et al. (en)
|
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
