About: Bradley v Commonwealth

An Entity of Type: Thing, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Bradley v Commonwealth, also referred to as the Rhodesian Information Centre case, is a 1973 High Court of Australia case. It was brought by Denzil Bradley against Australia following the Postmaster-General of Australia cutting off telephones and postal service to the Rhodesian Information Centre that he operated. The court ruled on a 3–2 majority that the Postmaster-General lacked the power to arbitrarily stop providing services.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Bradley v Commonwealth, also referred to as the Rhodesian Information Centre case, is a 1973 High Court of Australia case. It was brought by Denzil Bradley against Australia following the Postmaster-General of Australia cutting off telephones and postal service to the Rhodesian Information Centre that he operated. The court ruled on a 3–2 majority that the Postmaster-General lacked the power to arbitrarily stop providing services. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 68474632 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 12674 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1100099540 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:concurring
  • Justice Stephen (en)
dbp:court
dbp:dateDecided
  • 1973-09-10 (xsd:date)
dbp:decisionBy
  • Chief Justice Barwick, Justice Gibbs (en)
dbp:dissenting
  • Justice McTiernan, Justice Menzies (en)
dbp:fullName
  • Bradley v. The Commonwealth (en)
dbp:name
  • Bradley v Commonwealth (en)
dbp:numberOfJudges
  • 5 (xsd:integer)
dbp:opinions
  • The Postmaster-General does not have the power to unilaterally cut off telephones or postal services (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdfs:comment
  • Bradley v Commonwealth, also referred to as the Rhodesian Information Centre case, is a 1973 High Court of Australia case. It was brought by Denzil Bradley against Australia following the Postmaster-General of Australia cutting off telephones and postal service to the Rhodesian Information Centre that he operated. The court ruled on a 3–2 majority that the Postmaster-General lacked the power to arbitrarily stop providing services. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Bradley v Commonwealth (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License