An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Fong Yue Ting v. United States, 149 U.S. 698 (1893), decided by the United States Supreme Court on May 15, 1893, was a case challenging provisions in Section 6 of the Geary Act of 1892 that extended and amended the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882. The provisions in question required Chinese in the United States to obtain certificates of residency, and allowed for the arrest and deportation of Chinese who had failed to obtain these certificates, even if they had not violated any other laws. The case involved writs of habeas corpus from Fong Yue Ting and two other Chinese citizens residing in New York City who were arrested and detained for not having certificates. The Supreme Court decision (5 to 3) was in favor of the United States government, upholding the Geary Act and denying the writs of

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Fong Yue Ting v. United States, 149 U.S. 698 (1893), decided by the United States Supreme Court on May 15, 1893, was a case challenging provisions in Section 6 of the Geary Act of 1892 that extended and amended the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882. The provisions in question required Chinese in the United States to obtain certificates of residency, and allowed for the arrest and deportation of Chinese who had failed to obtain these certificates, even if they had not violated any other laws. The case involved writs of habeas corpus from Fong Yue Ting and two other Chinese citizens residing in New York City who were arrested and detained for not having certificates. The Supreme Court decision (5 to 3) was in favor of the United States government, upholding the Geary Act and denying the writs of habeas corpus. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 49582659 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 24448 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1101821731 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-05-10 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1893 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Fong Yue Ting v. United States, (en)
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-05-15 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1893 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Brewer (en)
  • Field (en)
  • Fuller (en)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • Fong Yue Ting v. United States (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:joinmajority
  • Blatchford, Brown, Jackson, Shiras (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • Fong Yue Ting v. United States (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Gray (en)
dbp:notparticipating
  • Harlan (en)
dbp:openjurist
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 13 (xsd:integer)
dbp:prior
  • Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York (en)
dbp:uspage
  • 698 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 149 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Fong Yue Ting v. United States, 149 U.S. 698 (1893), decided by the United States Supreme Court on May 15, 1893, was a case challenging provisions in Section 6 of the Geary Act of 1892 that extended and amended the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882. The provisions in question required Chinese in the United States to obtain certificates of residency, and allowed for the arrest and deportation of Chinese who had failed to obtain these certificates, even if they had not violated any other laws. The case involved writs of habeas corpus from Fong Yue Ting and two other Chinese citizens residing in New York City who were arrested and detained for not having certificates. The Supreme Court decision (5 to 3) was in favor of the United States government, upholding the Geary Act and denying the writs of (en)
rdfs:label
  • Fong Yue Ting v. United States (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • Fong Yue Ting v. United States (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License