This HTML5 document contains 112 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
n29https://web.archive.org/web/20090421074312/http:/hisdefense.org/articles/
n17http://ndpr.nd.edu/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
dbpedia-huhttp://hu.dbpedia.org/resource/
n19https://books.google.com/
n28https://www.academia.edu/43436853/
n24https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
n18https://web.archive.org/web/20110726151321/http:/www.hisdefense.org/audio/
dbpedia-trhttp://tr.dbpedia.org/resource/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
dbpedia-hrhttp://hr.dbpedia.org/resource/
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n26https://web.archive.org/web/20090930150703/http:/www.calvin.edu/academic/philosophy/virtual_library/articles/plantinga_alvin/
dbpedia-fahttp://fa.dbpedia.org/resource/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n31http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/paul_draper/
n7https://web.archive.org/web/20090505103043/http:/hisdefense.org/OnlineLectures/tabid/136/
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n16https://archive.org/details/
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Evolutionary_argument_against_naturalism
rdf:type
yago:Communication100033020 yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:WikicatPhilosophicalArguments yago:Evidence106643408 yago:Indication106797169 yago:Argument106648724
rdfs:label
Evolutionary argument against naturalism
rdfs:comment
The evolutionary argument against naturalism (EAAN) is a philosophical argument asserting a problem with believing both evolution and philosophical naturalism simultaneously. The argument was first proposed by Alvin Plantinga in 1993 and "raises issues of interest to epistemologists, philosophers of mind, evolutionary biologists, and philosophers of religion". The EAAN argues that the combined belief in both evolutionary theory and naturalism is epistemically self-defeating. The argument for this is that if both evolution and naturalism are true, then the probability of having reliable cognitive faculties is low. This argument comes as an expansion of the argument from reason, although the two are separate philosophical arguments.
dcterms:subject
dbc:Naturalism_(philosophy) dbc:Philosophical_arguments dbc:Epistemology_of_religion dbc:Philosophy_of_religion
dbo:wikiPageID
7322651
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1101025017
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Victor_Reppert dbr:Charles_Darwin dbr:Alvin_Plantinga dbr:Cognitive_science dbr:Naturalistic_Evolution dbr:Naturalism_(philosophy) dbr:Miracles_(book) dbr:Materialism dbr:Bayes_Theorem dbr:Stephen_R._L._Clark dbr:Trenton_Merricks dbr:Philosophy_of_mind dbr:C._S._Lewis dbr:William_Alston dbr:Quantum_mechanics dbr:Mental_representation dbr:Empirical_evidence dbr:University_of_California,_Berkeley dbc:Naturalism_(philosophy) dbr:Dualism_(philosophy_of_mind) dbr:Ernest_Sosa dbr:Truth-value dbr:Phillip_E._Johnson dbr:University_of_Wisconsin–Madison dbc:Philosophical_arguments dbr:Supervenience dbr:Jerry_Fodor dbr:Descartes dbr:Epiphenomenalism dbr:University_of_Notre_Dame dbr:Arthur_Balfour dbr:Problem_of_mental_causation dbr:Intelligent_design dbr:Richard_Taylor_(philosopher) dbr:Epistemology dbr:Evolution dbr:Evolution_of_human_intelligence dbr:Eliminative_materialism dbr:Conditional_probability dbr:J._P._Moreland dbr:Argument_from_reason dbc:Epistemology_of_religion dbr:Metaphysical_naturalism dbr:Thomas_Reid dbr:Darwin_on_Trial dbr:Defeater dbr:Evolutionary_epistemology dbr:Conflict_thesis dbr:Evolutionary_theory dbr:Richard_Purtill dbr:Skepticism dbc:Philosophy_of_religion dbr:Hyperbolic_doubt dbr:Self_refuting_idea dbr:William_Hasker dbr:James_N._Jordan dbr:Theodicy dbr:James_Beilby dbr:Paul_Draper_(philosopher) dbr:Theory_of_evolution dbr:Branden_Fitelson dbr:Theism dbr:Lottery_paradox dbr:Indiana_University_South_Bend dbr:Michael_Ruse dbr:Elliott_Sober
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n7:Default.aspx n16:warrantedchristi0000plan n17:review.cfm%3Fid=1105 n18:Plantinga%20-%20Evolutionary%20Arguments%20against%20Naturalism.rm n19:books%3Fid=4OqJbrwcHtoC n26:naturalism_defeated.pdf n28:Does_the_Evolutionary_Argument_Against_Naturalism_Defeat_Gods_Beliefs n19:books%3Fid=iQuoWpUCuWcC n29:ap001.html n19:books%3Fid=p40tc_T7-rMC%7C n31:intro2.html n19:books%3Fid=KmQ5AAAACAAJ
owl:sameAs
freebase:m.025z44_ dbpedia-fa:برهان_فرگشتی_علیه_طبیعت‌گرایی dbpedia-tr:Natüralizme_karşı_evrimsel_argüman dbpedia-hr:Evolucijski_argument_protiv_naturalizma dbpedia-hu:Evolúciós_érv_a_naturalizmussal_szemben n24:4jU6x yago-res:Evolutionary_argument_against_naturalism wikidata:Q5418693
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Short_description dbt:Convert dbt:Cite_book dbt:Refbegin dbt:Refend dbt:Reflist dbt:Quotation
dbo:abstract
The evolutionary argument against naturalism (EAAN) is a philosophical argument asserting a problem with believing both evolution and philosophical naturalism simultaneously. The argument was first proposed by Alvin Plantinga in 1993 and "raises issues of interest to epistemologists, philosophers of mind, evolutionary biologists, and philosophers of religion". The EAAN argues that the combined belief in both evolutionary theory and naturalism is epistemically self-defeating. The argument for this is that if both evolution and naturalism are true, then the probability of having reliable cognitive faculties is low. This argument comes as an expansion of the argument from reason, although the two are separate philosophical arguments.
gold:hypernym
dbr:Argument
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Evolutionary_argument_against_naturalism?oldid=1101025017&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
37641
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Evolutionary_argument_against_naturalism