This HTML5 document contains 121 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n18https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/151/714/1488662/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n14https://scholar.google.com/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n23https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/328/
n25https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n6https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/104302/securities-and-exchange-commission-v-w-j-howey-co/
n19http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep328/usrep328293/
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n20https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/328/293/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n22https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/328/
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/
dbpedia-jahttp://ja.dbpedia.org/resource/
n16https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/60/440/1968914/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:SEC_v._W._J._Howey_Co.
rdf:type
wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:Case dbo:UnitOfWork dbo:LegalCase owl:Thing dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:label
SEC v. W. J. Howey Co. アメリカ証券取引委員会対W. J. Howey社事件
rdfs:comment
Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co., 328 U.S. 293 (1946), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the offer of a land sales and service contract was an "investment contract" within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. § 77b) and that the use of the mails and interstate commerce in the offer and sale of these securities was a violation of §5 of the Act, 15 U.S.C. § 77e. It was an important case in determining the general applicability of the federal securities laws. アメリカ証券取引委員会対W. J. Howey社事件（あめりかしょうけんとりひきいいんかいたいダブリュー・ジェイ・ハウィーしゃじけん、Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co., (1946)）は、合衆国最高裁判所が、土地の販売及び業務委託契約は1933年証券法（合衆国法典第15編第77b条 15 U.S.C. § 77b）に定める「投資契約（investment contract）」に該当し、またこれらの販売勧誘のために郵便及び州際通商を用いることは1933年証券法第5条（合衆国法典第15編第77e条 15 U.S.C. § 77e）に違反すると判断した判決である。この判決は、連邦証券法の一般的な適用範囲を定めた重要な判決である。
foaf:name
Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co. et al.
dcterms:subject
dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Stone_Court dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:U.S._Securities_and_Exchange_Commission_litigation dbc:United_States_securities_case_law dbc:1946_in_United_States_case_law dbc:William_John_Howey
dbo:wikiPageID
6712362
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1076659188
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Contract dbr:William_John_Howey dbr:Resort dbr:Felix_Frankfurter dbr:Federal_Supplement dbr:United_States_securities_law dbr:Lawsuit dbr:Acre dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Stone_Court dbr:Real_estate_contract dbr:Federal_Reporter dbr:Grove_(nature) dbr:Hotel dbr:SEC_filing dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_328 dbr:Leaseback dbr:Citrus dbr:United_States_district_court dbr:Profit_(economics) dbr:Defendant dbr:American_Law_Reports dbr:Mail dbr:Agriculture dbr:Common_law dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Fifth_Circuit dbc:U.S._Securities_and_Exchange_Commission_litigation dbr:Securities_and_Exchange_Commission dbr:Florida dbr:Warranty_deed dbr:LexisNexis dbr:Corporation dbr:5th_Cir. dbr:U.S._District_Court_for_the_Southern_District_of_Florida dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Southern_District_of_Florida dbc:United_States_securities_case_law dbr:Dissenting_opinion dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Lawyers'_Edition dbc:1946_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Farmer dbr:Blue_sky_laws dbr:Certiorari dbr:Frank_Murphy dbr:Interstate_commerce dbr:Securities dbr:Right_of_entry dbr:Securities_Act_of_1933 dbc:William_John_Howey dbr:Income dbr:Capital_(economics) dbr:Injunction
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n14:scholar_case%3Fcase=12975052269830471754 n16: n18: n19:usrep328293.pdf n20:case.html n6: n22:293.html n23:293
owl:sameAs
yago-res:SEC_v._W._J._Howey_Co. freebase:m.0gjsps wikidata:Q7444927 dbpedia-ja:アメリカ証券取引委員会対W._J._Howey社事件 n25:4v3p8
dbp:subsequent
0001-10-14
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Wikisource-inline dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:UnitedStatesCode dbt:Ussc dbt:Primary_sources dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist
dbp:dissent
Frankfurter
dbp:joinmajority
Black, Reed, Douglas, Burton, Rutledge
dbp:lawsapplied
dbr:Securities_Act_of_1933
dbp:parallelcitations
66
dbp:prior
17280.0
dbp:uspage
293
dbp:usvol
328
dbp:arguedate
0001-05-02
dbp:argueyear
1946
dbp:case
Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.,
dbp:courtlistener
n6:
dbp:decidedate
0001-05-27
dbp:decideyear
1946
dbp:findlaw
n22:293.html
dbp:fullname
Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co. et al.
dbp:holding
An investment contract for purposes of the Securities Act means a contract, transaction or scheme whereby a person invests his money in a common enterprise and is led to expect profits solely from the efforts of the promoter or a third party, it being immaterial whether the shares in the enterprise are evidenced by formal certificates or by nominal interests in the physical assets employed in the enterprise.
dbp:justia
n20:case.html
dbp:litigants
Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.
dbp:majority
Murphy
dbp:loc
n19:usrep328293.pdf
dbo:abstract
アメリカ証券取引委員会対W. J. Howey社事件（あめりかしょうけんとりひきいいんかいたいダブリュー・ジェイ・ハウィーしゃじけん、Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co., (1946)）は、合衆国最高裁判所が、土地の販売及び業務委託契約は1933年証券法（合衆国法典第15編第77b条 15 U.S.C. § 77b）に定める「投資契約（investment contract）」に該当し、またこれらの販売勧誘のために郵便及び州際通商を用いることは1933年証券法第5条（合衆国法典第15編第77e条 15 U.S.C. § 77e）に違反すると判断した判決である。この判決は、連邦証券法の一般的な適用範囲を定めた重要な判決である。 Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co., 328 U.S. 293 (1946), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the offer of a land sales and service contract was an "investment contract" within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. § 77b) and that the use of the mails and interstate commerce in the offer and sale of these securities was a violation of §5 of the Act, 15 U.S.C. § 77e. It was an important case in determining the general applicability of the federal securities laws. The case resulted in a test, known as the Howey test, to determine whether an instrument qualifies as an "investment contract" for the purposes of the Securities Act: "a contract, transaction or scheme whereby a person invests his money in a common enterprise and is led to expect profits solely from the efforts of the promoter or a third party."
dbp:cornell
n23:293
dbp:googlescholar
n14:scholar_case%3Fcase=12975052269830471754
dbp:notparticipating
Jackson
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:SEC_v._W._J._Howey_Co.?oldid=1076659188&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
9182
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:SEC_v._W._J._Howey_Co.