This HTML5 document contains 131 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n15https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
n8https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n12https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2020/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Begum_v_Home_Secretary
rdfs:label
Begum v Home Secretary
rdfs:comment
Begum v Home Secretary [2021] UKSC 7 is the short name of three closely connected proceedings considered together in the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, R (on the application of Begum) v Special Immigration Appeals Commission; R (on the application of Begum) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; and Begum v Secretary of State for the Home Department, concerning Shamima Begum, a woman born in the United Kingdom who at the age of 15 travelled to Syria to join the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS). Her intention to return to England in 2019 resulted in a public debate about the handling of returning jihadists.
dbp:name
Begum v Home Secretary
dcterms:subject
dbc:Home_Office_litigation dbc:Denaturalized_citizens_of_the_United_Kingdom dbc:2021_in_case_law dbc:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom_cases dbc:2021_in_British_law dbc:Denaturalization_case_law dbc:British_nationality_law
dbo:wikiPageID
66913771
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1107755060
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbc:Home_Office_litigation dbr:Twitter dbr:Al-Roj dbr:Human_trafficking dbr:Islamic_State_of_Iraq_and_the_Levant dbr:Anthony_Loyd dbr:President_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom dbr:Secretary_of_State_for_the_Home_Department dbr:Deputy_President_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom dbr:Bangladeshi_nationality_law dbr:Article_3_of_the_European_Convention_on_Human_Rights dbr:Eleanor_Roosevelt dbr:Human_rights dbr:Robert_Reed,_Baron_Reed_of_Allermuir dbr:Fingerprints dbc:2021_in_case_law dbc:Denaturalized_citizens_of_the_United_Kingdom dbr:Elisabeth_Laing dbc:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom_cases dbr:Reprieve_(organisation) dbr:CNN dbr:Home_Secretary dbr:James_Eadie_(barrister) dbc:2021_in_British_law dbr:Jihadism dbr:ITN_News dbr:Rabinder_Singh_(judge) dbr:JUSTICE dbr:Patrick_Hodge,_Lord_Hodge dbr:Metropolitan_Police dbr:The_Daily_Telegraph dbr:Government_Legal_Department dbc:Denaturalization_case_law dbr:Bangladesh_nationality_law dbr:Patrick_O'Flynn dbr:Liberty_(advocacy_group) dbr:ITV_News dbr:Intervention_(law) dbr:The_Washington_Post dbr:National_security dbr:Eleanor_King_(judge) dbr:Bethnal_Green dbr:Leave_to_enter dbr:Case_citation dbr:Cause_célèbre dbr:The_Times dbr:Julian_Flaux dbr:EWCA_Civ dbr:Terrorism_Act_2000 dbr:Fionnuala_Ní_Aoláin dbr:British_Nationality_Act_1981 dbr:International_Commission_of_Jurists dbr:United_Nations_special_rapporteur dbr:David_Lloyd_Jones,_Lord_Lloyd-Jones dbr:Jill_Black,_Lady_Black_of_Derwent dbr:Immigration_Act_1971 dbr:Sajid_Javid dbr:Nationality,_Immigration_and_Asylum_Act_2002 dbr:Special_Immigration_Appeals_Commission dbr:Stay_of_proceedings dbr:Jeremy_Hunt dbr:Court_of_Appeal_(England_and_Wales) dbr:Priti_Patel dbr:David_Pannick,_Baron_Pannick dbr:Judicial_review dbr:De_novo_review dbr:Guglielmo_Verdirame dbr:Human_Rights_Act_1998 dbr:David_Davis_(British_politician) dbr:Syria dbr:European_Convention_on_Human_Rights dbr:Philip_Sales,_Lord_Sales dbr:Shamima_Begum dbr:Cross-appeal dbc:British_nationality_law dbr:Al-Hawl_refugee_camp dbr:BBC dbr:Bangladesh dbr:Lord_Lloyd-Jones dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom dbr:Extremism dbr:Netherlands dbr:Divisional_court_(England_and_Wales) dbr:Article_2_of_the_European_Convention_on_Human_Rights dbr:Brides_of_ISIL dbr:Legal_aid dbr:Mulberry_Academy_Shoreditch dbr:Bethnal_Green_trio dbr:Minor_(law) dbr:Sky_News dbr:The_Guardian dbr:Age_of_majority dbr:Legal_Aid_Agency
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n8:uksc-2020-0156-judgment.pdf n12:918.html
owl:sameAs
n15:FmhR8 wikidata:Q105973464
dbp:transcripts
n8:uksc-2020-0156-judgment.pdf
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Infobox_court_case dbt:Quote dbt:Reflist dbt:Nbsp dbt:Short_description dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Blockquote
dbp:citations
[2021] UKSC 7
dbp:court
dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom
dbp:fullName
R v Special Immigration Appeals Commission ; R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ; and Begum v Secretary of State for the Home Department
dbp:imagealt
Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
dbp:imagesize
150
dbp:judges
President Lord Reed, Deputy President Lord Hodge, Lady Black, Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lord Sales
dbo:abstract
Begum v Home Secretary [2021] UKSC 7 is the short name of three closely connected proceedings considered together in the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, R (on the application of Begum) v Special Immigration Appeals Commission; R (on the application of Begum) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; and Begum v Secretary of State for the Home Department, concerning Shamima Begum, a woman born in the United Kingdom who at the age of 15 travelled to Syria to join the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS). Her intention to return to England in 2019 resulted in a public debate about the handling of returning jihadists. The case was heard on 23 and 24 November 2020, and in a judgment delivered on 26 February 2021 the Supreme Court unanimously found in favour of the Home Secretary on her appeal against an Order of the Court of Appeal that Begum should be given leave to enter the United Kingdom, which it overturned. It also dismissed Begum's applications for judicial review of the leave to enter decision and of the Special Immigration Appeals Commission's preliminary decision in a deprivation of citizenship appeal. It considered that Begum's challenge to her loss of British citizenship could only be stayed until such time as she is in a position to play an effective part in it without the safety of the public being compromised.
dbp:dateDecided
2021-02-26
dbp:imagelink
dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom
dbp:opinions
The Supreme Court unanimously allows the Secretary of State's appeals in each of the proceedings, and dismisses Begum's cross-appeal. Her leave to enter appeal, her application for judicial review of the leave to enter decision, and her application for judicial review of the Special Immigration Appeals Commission's preliminary decision in the deprivation appeal, are all dismissed.
dbp:priorActions
dbr:Court_of_Appeal_(England_and_Wales)
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Begum_v_Home_Secretary?oldid=1107755060&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
24587
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Begum_v_Home_Secretary