About: Woodford v. Ngo

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Woodford v. Ngo Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : umbel-rc:Event, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FWoodford_v._Ngo

Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case about the procedures determining when prison litigation may be commenced in federal court. Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the majority, ruled that prisoners must exhaust all state-court remedies in accordance with the rules thereof before filing claims in federal court. Justice Stephen Breyer filed a concurrence. Justice John Paul Stevens filed a dissent.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCasesOfTheRobertsCourt yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity Supreme Court of the United States case umbel-rc:Event
rdfs:label	Woodford v. Ngo (en)
rdfs:comment	Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case about the procedures determining when prison litigation may be commenced in federal court. Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the majority, ruled that prisoners must exhaust all state-court remedies in accordance with the rules thereof before filing claims in federal court. Justice Stephen Breyer filed a concurrence. Justice John Paul Stevens filed a dissent. (en)
foaf:name	(en) Jeanne S. Woodford, et al., Petitioners v. Viet Mike Ngo (en)
dcterms:subject	United States Supreme Court cases United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court United States civil procedure case law 2006 in United States case law San Quentin State Prison
Wikipage page ID	8202403 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	895905390 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	California Prison Samuel Alito San Quentin State Prison David Souter John Paul Stevens United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit United States District Court for the Northern District of California United States Supreme Court cases United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court Ruth Bader Ginsburg Homicide United States civil procedure case law Stephen Breyer Lady lawyer 9th Cir. 2006 in United States case law San Quentin State Prison L. Ed. 2d Supreme Court of the United States Certiorari Civil Rights Act of 1871 Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 F.3d U.S. LEXIS
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=12698959200132700084 https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/05-416.ZO.html https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20080821134 https://www.oyez.org/cases/2005/05-416 https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/548/81.html https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/403/620/561382/ https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/548/81/ https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/145635/woodford-v-ngo/ https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/05pdf/05-416.pdf
sameAs	Woodford v. Ngo Woodford v. Ngo Woodford v. Ngo Woodford v. Ngo
Subsequent	25920.0 (second)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Ussc
Dissent	Stevens (en)
docket	5 (xsd:integer)
JoinDissent	Souter, Ginsburg (en)
JoinMajority	Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas (en)
LawsApplied	Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995
oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2005/05-416
ParallelCitations	172800.0 (second)
Prior	25920.0 (second)
USPage	81 (xsd:integer)
USVol	548 (xsd:integer)
ArgueDate	0001-03-22 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ArgueYear	2006 (xsd:integer)
case	Woodford v. Ngo, (en)
courtlistener	https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/145635/woodford-v-ngo/
DecideDate	0001-06-22 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	2006 (xsd:integer)
findlaw	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/548/81.html
fullname	Jeanne S. Woodford, et al., Petitioners v. Viet Mike Ngo (en)
Holding	The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 requirement that a prisoner exhaust any available administrative remedies before challenging prison conditions in federal court bars him from doing so not only when this first lawsuit has been lost, but also when he failed to timely brought it. (en)
justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/548/81/
Litigants	Woodford v. Ngo (en)
majority	Alito (en)
other source	Supreme Court (en)
other url	https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/05pdf/05-416.pdf
has abstract	Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case about the procedures determining when prison litigation may be commenced in federal court. Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the majority, ruled that prisoners must exhaust all state-court remedies in accordance with the rules thereof before filing claims in federal court. Justice Stephen Breyer filed a concurrence. Justice John Paul Stevens filed a dissent. (en)
Concurrence	Breyer (en)
cornell	https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/05-416.ZO.html
googlescholar	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=12698959200132700084
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Woodford_v._Ngo?oldid=895905390&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	6252 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Woodford_v._Ngo

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3331 as of Sep 2 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (61 GB total memory, 49 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software