About: Woodford v. Ngo

An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case about the procedures determining when prison litigation may be commenced in federal court. Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the majority, ruled that prisoners must exhaust all state-court remedies in accordance with the rules thereof before filing claims in federal court. Justice Stephen Breyer filed a concurrence. Justice John Paul Stevens filed a dissent.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case about the procedures determining when prison litigation may be commenced in federal court. Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the majority, ruled that prisoners must exhaust all state-court remedies in accordance with the rules thereof before filing claims in federal court. Justice Stephen Breyer filed a concurrence. Justice John Paul Stevens filed a dissent. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=12698959200132700084 https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/05-416.ZO.html https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20080821134 https://www.oyez.org/cases/2005/05-416 https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/548/81.html https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/403/620/561382/ https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/548/81/ https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/145635/woodford-v-ngo/ https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/05pdf/05-416.pdf
dbo:wikiPageID	8202403 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	6252 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	895905390 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:California dbr:Prison dbr:Samuel_Alito dbr:San_Quentin_State_Prison dbr:David_Souter dbr:John_Paul_Stevens dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Northern_District_of_California dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbr:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg dbr:Murder dbc:United_States_civil_procedure_case_law dbr:Stephen_Breyer dbr:Lawsuit dbr:9th_Cir. dbc:2006_in_United_States_case_law dbc:San_Quentin_State_Prison dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Certiorari dbr:Civil_Rights_Act_of_1871 dbr:Prison_Litigation_Reform_Act_of_1995 dbr:F.3d dbr:U.S._LEXIS
dbp:arguedate	0001-03-22 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear	2006 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case	Woodford v. Ngo, (en)
dbp:concurrence	Breyer (en)
dbp:cornell	https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/05-416.ZO.html
dbp:courtlistener	https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/145635/woodford-v-ngo/
dbp:decidedate	0001-06-22 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear	2006 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent	Stevens (en)
dbp:docket	5 (xsd:integer)
dbp:findlaw	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/548/81.html
dbp:fullname	Jeanne S. Woodford, et al., Petitioners v. Viet Mike Ngo (en)
dbp:googlescholar	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=12698959200132700084
dbp:holding	The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 requirement that a prisoner exhaust any available administrative remedies before challenging prison conditions in federal court bars him from doing so not only when this first lawsuit has been lost, but also when he failed to timely brought it. (en)
dbp:joindissent	Souter, Ginsburg (en)
dbp:joinmajority	Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas (en)
dbp:justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/548/81/
dbp:lawsapplied	dbr:Prison_Litigation_Reform_Act_of_1995
dbp:litigants	Woodford v. Ngo (en)
dbp:majority	Alito (en)
dbp:otherSource	Supreme Court (en)
dbp:otherUrl	https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/05pdf/05-416.pdf
dbp:oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2005/05-416
dbp:parallelcitations	172800.0
dbp:prior	25920.0
dbp:subsequent	25920.0
dbp:uspage	81 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol	548 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Ussc
dcterms:subject	dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbc:United_States_civil_procedure_case_law dbc:2006_in_United_States_case_law dbc:San_Quentin_State_Prison
rdf:type	owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCasesOfTheRobertsCourt yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase umbel-rc:Event
rdfs:comment	Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case about the procedures determining when prison litigation may be commenced in federal court. Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the majority, ruled that prisoners must exhaust all state-court remedies in accordance with the rules thereof before filing claims in federal court. Justice Stephen Breyer filed a concurrence. Justice John Paul Stevens filed a dissent. (en)
rdfs:label	Woodford v. Ngo (en)
owl:sameAs	freebase:Woodford v. Ngo yago-res:Woodford v. Ngo wikidata:Woodford v. Ngo https://global.dbpedia.org/id/fdmm
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Woodford_v._Ngo?oldid=895905390&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Woodford_v._Ngo
foaf:name	(en) Jeanne S. Woodford, et al., Petitioners v. Viet Mike Ngo (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:548_U.S._81 dbr:Woodford_v_Ngo
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:Prison_Litigation_Reform_Act dbr:Samuel_Alito dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Roberts_Court dbr:548_U.S._81 dbr:Ross_v._Blake dbr:Woodford_v_Ngo
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Woodford_v._Ngo