About: United States v. Williams (2008)

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: United States v. Williams (2008) Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FUnited_States_v._Williams_%282008%29

United States v. Williams, 553 U.S. 285 (2008), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that a federal statute prohibiting the "pandering" of child pornography (offering or requesting to transfer, sell, deliver, or trade the items) did not violate the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, even if a person charged under the code did in fact not possess child pornography with which to trade.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case Supreme Court of the United States case
rdfs:label	United States v. Williams (2008) (en)
rdfs:comment	United States v. Williams, 553 U.S. 285 (2008), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that a federal statute prohibiting the "pandering" of child pornography (offering or requesting to transfer, sell, deliver, or trade the items) did not violate the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, even if a person charged under the code did in fact not possess child pornography with which to trade. (en)
foaf:name	(en) United States, Petitioner v. Michael Williams (en)
dcterms:subject	Child pornography law United States Supreme Court cases United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court Void for vagueness case law United States Free Speech Clause case law 2008 in United States case law
Wikipage page ID	17524914 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1123626111 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Child pornography law United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Virtual child pornography United States Supreme Court cases United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court Child pornography Federal Reporter Void for vagueness case law PROTECT Act of 2003 United States Free Speech Clause case law First Amendment to the United States Constitution Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition 2008 in United States case law Children L. Ed. 2d Supreme Court of the United States Holding (law) BDSM U.S. LEXIS
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/553/285/ https://www.oyez.org/cases/2007/06-694 https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/444/1286/546289/ https://web.archive.org/web/20080426151636/http:/www.usdoj.gov/osg/briefs/2006/2pet/7pet/2006-0694.pet.aa.pdf https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/06-694.pdf
sameAs	United States v. Williams (2008) United States v. Williams (2008)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Usc dbt:Ussc dbt:US1stAmendment
Dissent	Souter (en)
docket	6 (xsd:integer)
JoinDissent	Ginsburg (en)
JoinMajority	Roberts, Stevens, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Alito (en)
LawsApplied	U.S. Const. amend. I; (en)
oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2007/06-694
ParallelCitations	172800.0 (second)
Prior	25920.0 (second)
USPage	285 (xsd:integer)
USVol	553 (xsd:integer)
ArgueDate	0001-10-30 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ArgueYear	2007 (xsd:integer)
case	United States v. Williams, (en)
DecideDate	0001-05-19 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	2008 (xsd:integer)
fullname	United States, Petitioner v. Michael Williams (en)
Holding	Federal statute prohibiting the pandering of child pornography was not unconstitutionally overbroad. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals reversed. (en)
justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/553/285/
Litigants	United States v. Williams (en)
majority	Scalia (en)
other source	Supreme Court (en)
other url	https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/06-694.pdf
has abstract	United States v. Williams, 553 U.S. 285 (2008), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that a federal statute prohibiting the "pandering" of child pornography (offering or requesting to transfer, sell, deliver, or trade the items) did not violate the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, even if a person charged under the code did in fact not possess child pornography with which to trade. The decision overturned the Eleventh Circuit's ruling that the statute was facially void for overbreadth and vagueness. The Supreme Court reasoned that there is no First Amendment protection for offers to engage in illegal transactions, and that banning "the collateral speech that introduces such material into the child-pornography distribution network" does not in fact criminalize a "substantial amount of protected speech." (en)
Concurrence	Stevens (en)
JoinConcurrence	Breyer (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:United_States_v._Williams_(2008)?oldid=1123626111&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	9217 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:United_States_v._Williams_(2008)
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	Michael Williams Anti-pornography movement in the United States List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Roberts Court Dost test PROTECT Act of 2003 553 U.S. 285 First Amendment to the United States Constitution John Feldmeier United States v. Williams United States v Williams (2008)
is Wikipage redirect of	553 U.S. 285 United States v Williams (2008)
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:United_States_v._Williams_(2008)

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (62 GB total memory, 54 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software