An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

United States v. Williams, 553 U.S. 285 (2008), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that a federal statute prohibiting the "pandering" of child pornography (offering or requesting to transfer, sell, deliver, or trade the items) did not violate the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, even if a person charged under the code did in fact not possess child pornography with which to trade.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • United States v. Williams, 553 U.S. 285 (2008), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that a federal statute prohibiting the "pandering" of child pornography (offering or requesting to transfer, sell, deliver, or trade the items) did not violate the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, even if a person charged under the code did in fact not possess child pornography with which to trade. The decision overturned the Eleventh Circuit's ruling that the statute was facially void for overbreadth and vagueness. The Supreme Court reasoned that there is no First Amendment protection for offers to engage in illegal transactions, and that banning "the collateral speech that introduces such material into the child-pornography distribution network" does not in fact criminalize a "substantial amount of protected speech." (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 17524914 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 9217 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1123626111 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-10-30 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 2007 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • United States v. Williams, (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Stevens (en)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-05-19 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 2008 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Souter (en)
dbp:docket
  • 6 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • United States, Petitioner v. Michael Williams (en)
dbp:holding
  • Federal statute prohibiting the pandering of child pornography was not unconstitutionally overbroad. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals reversed. (en)
dbp:joinconcurrence
  • Breyer (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • Ginsburg (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Roberts, Stevens, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Alito (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
  • U.S. Const. amend. I; (en)
dbp:litigants
  • United States v. Williams (en)
dbp:majority
  • Scalia (en)
dbp:otherSource
  • Supreme Court (en)
dbp:otherUrl
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:prior
  • 25920.0
dbp:uspage
  • 285 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 553 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • United States v. Williams, 553 U.S. 285 (2008), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that a federal statute prohibiting the "pandering" of child pornography (offering or requesting to transfer, sell, deliver, or trade the items) did not violate the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, even if a person charged under the code did in fact not possess child pornography with which to trade. (en)
rdfs:label
  • United States v. Williams (2008) (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • United States, Petitioner v. Michael Williams (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License