About: Frontiero v. Richardson     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : umbel-rc:Event, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FFrontiero_v._Richardson

Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case which decided that benefits given by the United States military to the family of service members cannot be given out differently because of sex. Frontiero is an important decision in several respects, including the fact that it informed the military establishment that in terms of pay, allowances and general treatment, women must be considered on an equal plane as men. However, the Court did not issue a broad decision requiring the military to prove in the courts its reasons for excluding women from combat positions.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Frontiero v. Richardson (de)
  • Frontiero v. Richardson (en)
rdfs:comment
  • Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case which decided that benefits given by the United States military to the family of service members cannot be given out differently because of sex. Frontiero is an important decision in several respects, including the fact that it informed the military establishment that in terms of pay, allowances and general treatment, women must be considered on an equal plane as men. However, the Court did not issue a broad decision requiring the military to prove in the courts its reasons for excluding women from combat positions. (en)
  • Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973), war ein bahnbrechender Fall vor dem Obersten Gerichtshof der Vereinigten Staaten, in dem entschieden wurde, dass Leistungen, die die Streitkräfte der Vereinigten Staaten an die Familie von Dienstmitgliedern gewähren, nicht aufgrund des Geschlechts unterschiedlich verteilt werden dürfen. Frontiero ist in mehrfacher Hinsicht eine wichtige Entscheidung, u. a. aufgrund der Tatsache, dass es dem militärischen Establishment mitgeteilt hat, dass Frauen in Bezug auf Bezahlung, Zulagen und allgemeine Behandlung auf gleicher Ebene wie Männer betrachtet werden müssen. Das Gericht erließ jedoch keine weit gefasste Entscheidung, die vom Militär verlangt, vor Gericht die Gründe für den Ausschluss von Frauen von Kampfpositionen nachzuweisen.Sharron Frontiero (de)
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Sharron A. Frontiero and Joseph Frontiero v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of Defense, et al. (en)
dcterms:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
sameAs
Subsequent
  • None (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
Dissent
  • Rehnquist (en)
LawsApplied
  • U.S. Const. amend. V; 37 U.S.C. §§ 401, 403; 10 U.S.C. §§ 1072, 1076 (en)
oyez
ParallelCitations
Prior
  • Frontiero v. Laird, 341 F. Supp. 201 , probable jurisdiction noted, (en)
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 50 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software