About: Freedom of movement under United States law     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:Right105174653, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FFreedom_of_movement_under_United_States_law

Freedom of movement under United States law is governed primarily by the Privileges and Immunities Clause of the United States Constitution which states, "The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States." Since the circuit court ruling in Corfield v. Coryell, 6 Fed. Cas. 546 (1823), freedom of movement has been judicially recognized as a fundamental Constitutional right. In Paul v. Virginia, 75 U.S. 168 (1869), the court defined freedom of movement as "right of free ingress into other States, and egress from them." However, the Supreme Court did not invest the federal government with the authority to protect freedom of movement. Under the "privileges and immunities" clause, this authority was given to the states, a position th

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Freedom of movement under United States law (en)
  • 米国法における移動の自由 (ja)
rdfs:comment
  • 米国法おける移動の自由は(べいこくほうにおけるいどうのじゆう)は、第一次的には合衆国憲法2節1項(各々の州の市民は、他州において、その州の市民が享有するすべての特権および免除を等しく享有する権利を有する。)が宣言する特権及び免除条項により保障される。巡回裁判所による判決(1823年)以来、移動の自由は憲法上の基本権として司法的に承認されてきた。判決(1869年)において、裁判所は移動の自由を他州に立ち入り、また退去する自由の権利であると判示した。 しかしながら、合衆国最高裁判所は連邦政府に移動の自由を保護する権限を授権しなかった。特権及び免除条項の下ではこの権限は各州に与えらえており、最高裁が本件で採用した立場はウォード対メリーランド州事件(1871年)(1873年)、(1883年)でも一貫して維持されてきた。 (ja)
  • Freedom of movement under United States law is governed primarily by the Privileges and Immunities Clause of the United States Constitution which states, "The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States." Since the circuit court ruling in Corfield v. Coryell, 6 Fed. Cas. 546 (1823), freedom of movement has been judicially recognized as a fundamental Constitutional right. In Paul v. Virginia, 75 U.S. 168 (1869), the court defined freedom of movement as "right of free ingress into other States, and egress from them." However, the Supreme Court did not invest the federal government with the authority to protect freedom of movement. Under the "privileges and immunities" clause, this authority was given to the states, a position th (en)
dcterms:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (61 GB total memory, 40 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software