About: Florence v. Shurtleff

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Florence v. Shurtleff Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FFlorence_v._Shurtleff

Florence v. Shurtleff, Civil No. 2:05CV000485 (D. Utah 2012), was a case in which the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah issued an order stating that individuals could not be prosecuted for posting adult content that was constitutionally protected on general access websites, nor could they be civilly liable for failing to prevent access to adult content, so long as the material is identifiable by filtering software. The order was the result of a 2005 lawsuit, The King's English v. Shurtleff, brought by Utah bookstores, artists, Internet Service Providers and the other organizations challenging the constitutionality of certain portions of a Utah law intended to protect minors from adult content.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
rdfs:label	Florence v. Shurtleff (en)
rdfs:comment	Florence v. Shurtleff, Civil No. 2:05CV000485 (D. Utah 2012), was a case in which the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah issued an order stating that individuals could not be prosecuted for posting adult content that was constitutionally protected on general access websites, nor could they be civilly liable for failing to prevent access to adult content, so long as the material is identifiable by filtering software. The order was the result of a 2005 lawsuit, The King's English v. Shurtleff, brought by Utah bookstores, artists, Internet Service Providers and the other organizations challenging the constitutionality of certain portions of a Utah law intended to protect minors from adult content. (en)
foaf:depiction
dcterms:subject	Censorship in the United States Internet censorship 2012 in Utah 2012 in United States case law United States copyright case law United States privacy case law Self-censorship American Civil Liberties Union litigation Content-control software United States First Amendment case law United States communications regulation case law
Wikipage page ID	41913121 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1121701241 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Motion for summary judgment Censorship in the United States Dee Benson Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Declaratory judgment U.S. District Court for the District of Utah Internet censorship Sable Communications of California v. FCC Strict scrutiny Ginsberg v. New York 2012 in Utah Commerce Clause Standing (law) 2012 in United States case law Dart v. Craigslist, Inc. Nitke v. Gonzales ACLU United States copyright case law United States privacy case law First Amendment to the United States Constitution First amendment Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Censorship Sexual predator Internet service providers Self-censorship American Civil Liberties Union litigation Children's Internet Protection Act Content-control software United States First Amendment case law Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States communications regulation case law Jon Huntsman, Jr. Injunction First Amendment Utah Attorney General Motion to dismiss United States v. American Library Association Free speech Filtering software Legal standing dbr:Center_for_Democracy_&_Technology_v._Pappert dbr:House_Bill_260 dbr:Utah_Harmful_to_Minors_Act
sameAs	Florence v. Shurtleff Florence v. Shurtleff Florence v. Shurtleff
university	University of California, Berkeley (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:WAP_assignment dbt:Italic_title dbt:Reflist dbt:Infobox_U.S._Courts_of_Appeals_case
thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/District-Utah.png?width=300
LawsApplied	First Amendment to the United States Constitution
ArgueDate	2012-04-12 (xsd:date)
course	Education_Program:University_of_California,_Berkeley/Cyberlaw_ (en)
court	U.S. District Court for the District of Utah
CourtSeal	District-Utah.png (en)
DecideDate	2012-05-15 (xsd:date)
Holding	Individuals cannot be prosecuted for posting constitutionally protected content for adults on general-access websites. They are not required by the Utah law to label such content. (en)
imagesize	220 (xsd:integer)
judges	Dee Benson
Litigants	Florence v. Shurtleff (en)
project	WikiProject Cyberlaw (en)
term	2014 (xsd:integer)
has abstract	Florence v. Shurtleff, Civil No. 2:05CV000485 (D. Utah 2012), was a case in which the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah issued an order stating that individuals could not be prosecuted for posting adult content that was constitutionally protected on general access websites, nor could they be civilly liable for failing to prevent access to adult content, so long as the material is identifiable by filtering software. The order was the result of a 2005 lawsuit, The King's English v. Shurtleff, brought by Utah bookstores, artists, Internet Service Providers and the other organizations challenging the constitutionality of certain portions of a Utah law intended to protect minors from adult content. (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Florence_v._Shurtleff?oldid=1121701241&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	17553 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Florence_v._Shurtleff
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	Dart v. Craigslist, Inc. Nitke v. Gonzales King's English, Inc. v. Shurtleff The King's English v. Shurtleff The King’s English v. Shurtleff
is Wikipage redirect of	King's English, Inc. v. Shurtleff The King's English v. Shurtleff The King’s English v. Shurtleff

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (61 GB total memory, 49 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software