dbo:abstract
|
- Blanchflower v. Blanchflower, 150 N.H. 226 (2003), is a landmark decision by the New Hampshire Supreme Court which ruled that sexual relations between two females, one of whom is married, does not constitute adultery because it is not technically sexual intercourse. (en)
|
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 7014 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-07-16 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:argueyear
| |
dbp:associatejudges
| |
dbp:case
|
- Blanchflower v. Blanchflower, 150 N.H. 226 (en)
|
dbp:chiefjudge
| |
dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-11-07 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:decideyear
| |
dbp:dissent
| |
dbp:fullname
|
- In the matter of David G. Blanchflower and Sian E. Blanchflower (en)
|
dbp:googlescholar
| |
dbp:holding
|
- Adultery is defined as the "voluntary sexual intercourse between a married man and someone other than his wife or between a married woman and someone other than her husband." Sexual intercourse is defined as "sexual connection esp. between humans: Coitus, Copulation." Coitus is defined to require "insertion of the penis in the vagina". Adultery within the meaning of the statute designating adultery as a cause for divorce does not include homosexual sexual relationships (en)
|
dbp:joindissent
| |
dbp:joinmajority
| |
dbp:justia
| |
dbp:lawsapplied
|
- New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated 458:7, II (en)
|
dbp:leagle
| |
dbp:litigants
|
- David Blanchflower v. Sian Blanchflower (en)
|
dbp:majority
| |
dbp:overruled
|
- In the Matter of Molly Blaisdell and Robert Blaisdell, No. 2020-0211 , "to the extent that it limits the definition of 'adultery,' as that term is used in RSA 458:7, II, to sexual intercourse between persons of the opposite sex." (en)
|
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dcterms:subject
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- Blanchflower v. Blanchflower, 150 N.H. 226 (2003), is a landmark decision by the New Hampshire Supreme Court which ruled that sexual relations between two females, one of whom is married, does not constitute adultery because it is not technically sexual intercourse. (en)
|
rdfs:label
|
- Blanchflower v. Blanchflower (en)
|
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |