An Entity of Type: Thing, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org:8891

Blanchflower v. Blanchflower, 150 N.H. 226 (2003), is a landmark decision by the New Hampshire Supreme Court which ruled that sexual relations between two females, one of whom is married, does not constitute adultery because it is not technically sexual intercourse.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Blanchflower v. Blanchflower, 150 N.H. 226 (2003), is a landmark decision by the New Hampshire Supreme Court which ruled that sexual relations between two females, one of whom is married, does not constitute adultery because it is not technically sexual intercourse. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 2487302 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 7014 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1079302778 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-07-16 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 2003 (xsd:integer)
dbp:associatejudges
dbp:case
  • Blanchflower v. Blanchflower, 150 N.H. 226 (en)
dbp:chiefjudge
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-11-07 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 2003 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Brock (en)
dbp:fullname
  • In the matter of David G. Blanchflower and Sian E. Blanchflower (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:holding
  • Adultery is defined as the "voluntary sexual intercourse between a married man and someone other than his wife or between a married woman and someone other than her husband." Sexual intercourse is defined as "sexual connection esp. between humans: Coitus, Copulation." Coitus is defined to require "insertion of the penis in the vagina". Adultery within the meaning of the statute designating adultery as a cause for divorce does not include homosexual sexual relationships (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • Broderick (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Duggan, Dalianis (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
  • New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated 458:7, II (en)
dbp:leagle
dbp:litigants
  • David Blanchflower v. Sian Blanchflower (en)
dbp:majority
  • Nadeau (en)
dbp:overruled
  • In the Matter of Molly Blaisdell and Robert Blaisdell, No. 2020-0211 , "to the extent that it limits the definition of 'adultery,' as that term is used in RSA 458:7, II, to sexual intercourse between persons of the opposite sex." (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdfs:comment
  • Blanchflower v. Blanchflower, 150 N.H. 226 (2003), is a landmark decision by the New Hampshire Supreme Court which ruled that sexual relations between two females, one of whom is married, does not constitute adultery because it is not technically sexual intercourse. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Blanchflower v. Blanchflower (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License