This HTML5 document contains 36 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
n14http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
dbpedia-cahttp://ca.dbpedia.org/resource/
n11https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n12http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/
dbpedia-fahttp://fa.dbpedia.org/resource/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Antenna_effect
rdf:type
dbo:Disease
rdfs:label
Antenna effect Efecte d'antena
rdfs:comment
The antenna effect, more formally plasma induced gate oxide damage, is an effect that can potentially cause yield and reliability problems during the manufacture of MOS integrated circuits. Factories (fabs) normally supply antenna rules, which are rules that must be obeyed to avoid this problem. A violation of such rules is called an antenna violation. The word antenna is something of a misnomer in this context—the problem is really the collection of charge, not the normal meaning of antenna, which is a device for converting electromagnetic fields to/from electrical currents. Occasionally the phrase antenna effect is used in this context, but this is less common since there are many effects, and the phrase does not make clear which is meant.
foaf:depiction
n12:AntennaEffect.gif n12:AntennaFixes.gif n12:Lateral_mosfet.svg
dcterms:subject
dbc:Integrated_circuits dbc:Electronic_design_automation
dbo:wikiPageID
12301749
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1089648409
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Antenna_(radio) dbr:High-κ_dielectric dbr:Diode dbr:Integrated_circuit n14:Lateral_mosfet.svg dbr:Gate_oxide dbc:Electronic_design_automation dbr:Silicon_dioxide dbr:Routing_(EDA) dbc:Integrated_circuits n14:AntennaEffect.gif dbr:Reactive-ion_etching n14:AntennaFixes.gif dbr:Semiconductor_device_fabrication
owl:sameAs
wikidata:Q4771251 n11:4RGmK dbpedia-fa:اثر_آنتن freebase:m.02vzklx dbpedia-ca:Efecte_d'antena
dbo:thumbnail
n12:AntennaEffect.gif?width=300
dbo:abstract
The antenna effect, more formally plasma induced gate oxide damage, is an effect that can potentially cause yield and reliability problems during the manufacture of MOS integrated circuits. Factories (fabs) normally supply antenna rules, which are rules that must be obeyed to avoid this problem. A violation of such rules is called an antenna violation. The word antenna is something of a misnomer in this context—the problem is really the collection of charge, not the normal meaning of antenna, which is a device for converting electromagnetic fields to/from electrical currents. Occasionally the phrase antenna effect is used in this context, but this is less common since there are many effects, and the phrase does not make clear which is meant. Figure 1(a) shows a side view of a typical net in an integrated circuit. Each net will include at least one driver, which must contain a source or drain diffusion (in newer technology implantation is used), and at least one receiver, which will consist of a gate electrode over a thin gate dielectric (see Figure 2 for a detailed view of a MOS transistor). Since the gate dielectric is so thin, only a few molecules thick, a big worry is breakdown of this layer. This can happen if the net somehow acquires a voltage somewhat higher than the normal operating voltage of the chip. (Historically, the gate dielectric has been silicon dioxide, so most of the literature refers to gate oxide damage or gate oxide breakdown. As of 2007, some manufacturers are replacing this oxide with various high-κ dielectric materials which may or may not be oxides, but the effect is still the same.) Once the chip is fabricated, this cannot happen, since every net has at least some source/drain implant connected to it. The source/drain implant forms a diode, which breaks down at a lower voltage than the oxide (either forward diode conduction, or reverse breakdown), and does so non-destructively. This protects the gate oxide. However, during the construction of the chip, the oxide may not be protected by a diode. This is shown in figure 1(b), which is the situation while metal 1 is being etched. Since metal 2 is not built yet, there is no diode connected to the gate oxide. So if a charge is added in any way to the metal 1 shape (as shown by the lightning bolt) it can rise to the level of breaking down the gate oxide. In particular, reactive-ion etching of the first metal layer can result in exactly the situation shown - the metal on each net is disconnected from the initial global metal layer, and the plasma etching is still adding charges to each piece of metal. Leaky gate oxides, although bad for power dissipation, are good for avoiding damage from the antenna effect. A leaky oxide can prevent a charge from building up to the point of causing oxide breakdown. This leads to the somewhat surprising observation that a very thin gate oxide is less likely to be damaged than a thick gate oxide, because as the oxide grows thinner, the leakage goes up exponentially, but the breakdown voltage shrinks only linearly.
gold:hypernym
dbr:Effect
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Antenna_effect?oldid=1089648409&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
6806
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Antenna_effect