About: Whirlpool Corp v Camco Inc

An Entity of Type: place, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Whirlpool Corp v Camco Inc, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 1067; 2000 SCC 67, is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on patent claim construction and double patenting. The court adopted purposive construction as the means to construe patent claims. This judgement is to be read along with the related decision, Free World Trust v Électro Santé Inc, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 1066, 2000 SCC 66, where the Court articulated the scope of protection provided by patents.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Whirlpool Corp v Camco Inc, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 1067; 2000 SCC 67, is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on patent claim construction and double patenting. The court adopted purposive construction as the means to construe patent claims. This judgement is to be read along with the related decision, Free World Trust v Électro Santé Inc, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 1066, 2000 SCC 66, where the Court articulated the scope of protection provided by patents. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	http://patents.ic.gc.ca/cipo/cpd/en/patent/1113156/summary.html%23 http://patents.ic.gc.ca/cipo/cpd/en/patent/1150361/summary.html
dbo:wikiPageID	19870853 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	3262 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	857351107 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:Double_patenting dbr:Federal_Court_(Canada) dbr:Federal_Court_of_Appeal dbr:Claim_(patent) dbc:Canadian_patent_case_law dbc:Whirlpool_Corporation_brands dbr:List_of_Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases_(McLachlin_Court) dbc:2000_in_Canadian_case_law dbr:Auger_(drill) dbc:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases dbr:Supreme_Court_of_Canada dbr:Free_World_Trust_v_Électro_Santé_Inc dbr:Washing_machine dbr:Claim_construction
dbp:caseName	Whirlpool Corp v Camco Inc (en)
dbp:citations	[2000] 2 S.C.R. 1067; 2000 SCC 67 (en)
dbp:decidedDate	2000-12-15 (xsd:date)
dbp:docket	27208 (xsd:integer)
dbp:heardDate	1999-12-14 (xsd:date)
dbp:ruling	Appeal dismissed. (en)
dbp:scc	1999 (xsd:integer)
dbp:unanimous	Binnie J. (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Canada-law-stub dbt:Reflist dbt:SCCInfoBox dbt:Lexum-scc dbt:Canadian_patent_law
dcterms:subject	dbc:Canadian_patent_case_law dbc:Whirlpool_Corporation_brands dbc:2000_in_Canadian_case_law dbc:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases
gold:hypernym	dbr:Court
rdf:type	dbo:Place yago:WikicatWhirlpoolCorporationBrands yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:LanguageUnit106284225 yago:Name106333653 yago:Part113809207 yago:Relation100031921 yago:TradeName106845599
rdfs:comment	Whirlpool Corp v Camco Inc, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 1067; 2000 SCC 67, is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on patent claim construction and double patenting. The court adopted purposive construction as the means to construe patent claims. This judgement is to be read along with the related decision, Free World Trust v Électro Santé Inc, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 1066, 2000 SCC 66, where the Court articulated the scope of protection provided by patents. (en)
rdfs:label	Whirlpool Corp v Camco Inc (en)
owl:sameAs	freebase:Whirlpool Corp v Camco Inc yago-res:Whirlpool Corp v Camco Inc wikidata:Whirlpool Corp v Camco Inc https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4xn6v
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Whirlpool_Corp_v_Camco_Inc?oldid=857351107&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Whirlpool_Corp_v_Camco_Inc
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:Whirlpool_Corp._v._Camco_Inc.
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:Amazon.com_Inc_v_Canada_(Commissioner_of_Patents) dbr:2000_reasons_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_Canada dbr:Reasons_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_Canada_by_Justice_Binnie dbr:Whirlpool_Corp._v._Camco_Inc.
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Whirlpool_Corp_v_Camco_Inc