An Entity of Type: place, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Free World Trust v Électro Santé Inc, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 1024, 2000 SCC 66, is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on patents, namely claim construction and the necessity to identify essential elements and non-essential elements. Along with the related decision, Camco v. Whirlpool (2001), 9 C.P.R. (4th) 129 (SCC), the Supreme Court of Canada rejected the doctrine of equivalents applied in the United States and adopted the doctrine of purposive construction, as originally applied by the United Kingdom House of Lords in Catnic v. Hill & Smith. This was a landmark decision as it resolved the uncertainty in Canadian case law between the two doctrines.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Free World Trust v Électro Santé Inc, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 1024, 2000 SCC 66, is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on patents, namely claim construction and the necessity to identify essential elements and non-essential elements. Along with the related decision, Camco v. Whirlpool (2001), 9 C.P.R. (4th) 129 (SCC), the Supreme Court of Canada rejected the doctrine of equivalents applied in the United States and adopted the doctrine of purposive construction, as originally applied by the United Kingdom House of Lords in Catnic v. Hill & Smith. This was a landmark decision as it resolved the uncertainty in Canadian case law between the two doctrines. The Court also articulated the scope of protection provided by patents and the requirements for infringement. (en)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 4444947 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 11744 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1084233206 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:caseName
  • Free World Trust v Électro Santé Inc (en)
dbp:citations
  • [2000] 2 S.C.R. 1024, 2000 SCC 66 (en)
dbp:decidedDate
  • 2000-12-15 (xsd:date)
dbp:docket
  • 26406 (xsd:integer)
dbp:heardDate
  • 1999-12-14 (xsd:date)
dbp:notparticipating
  • Lamer C.J. and Arbour J. (en)
dbp:ruling
  • Appeal dismissed. (en)
dbp:scc
  • 1999 (xsd:integer)
dbp:unanimous
  • Binnie J. (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
gold:hypernym
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Free World Trust v Électro Santé Inc, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 1024, 2000 SCC 66, is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on patents, namely claim construction and the necessity to identify essential elements and non-essential elements. Along with the related decision, Camco v. Whirlpool (2001), 9 C.P.R. (4th) 129 (SCC), the Supreme Court of Canada rejected the doctrine of equivalents applied in the United States and adopted the doctrine of purposive construction, as originally applied by the United Kingdom House of Lords in Catnic v. Hill & Smith. This was a landmark decision as it resolved the uncertainty in Canadian case law between the two doctrines. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Free World Trust v Électro Santé Inc (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License