| dbo:abstract
|
- Walter v Lane [1900] AC 539, was a judgement of the House of Lords on the question of Authorship under the Copyright Act 1842. It has come to be recognised as a seminal case on the notion of originality in copyright law and has been upheld as an early example of the sweat of the brow doctrine. (en)
|
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 4227 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:appealedFrom
| |
| dbp:citations
| |
| dbp:court
| |
| dbp:dateDecided
| |
| dbp:fullName
|
- Walter and another and Lane (en)
|
| dbp:judges
| |
| dbp:keywords
|
- Authors (en)
- Copyright (en)
- Newspaper (en)
- (en)
|
| dbp:name
| |
| dbp:numberOfJudges
| |
| dbp:priorActions
|
- Walter v Lane [1899] 2 Ch 749 (en)
|
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| gold:hypernym
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Walter v Lane [1900] AC 539, was a judgement of the House of Lords on the question of Authorship under the Copyright Act 1842. It has come to be recognised as a seminal case on the notion of originality in copyright law and has been upheld as an early example of the sweat of the brow doctrine. (en)
|
| rdfs:label
| |
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
