An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474 (1951), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that a court will defer to a federal agency's findings of fact if supported by "substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole." Universal Camera added another qualification to the substantial evidence test laid down in . The evidence supporting the agency's conclusion must be substantial in consideration of the record as a whole, even including the evidence that is not consistent with the agency's conclusion.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474 (1951), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that a court will defer to a federal agency's findings of fact if supported by "substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole." Universal Camera added another qualification to the substantial evidence test laid down in . The evidence supporting the agency's conclusion must be substantial in consideration of the record as a whole, even including the evidence that is not consistent with the agency's conclusion. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 1456861 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 5964 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1054361787 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedatea
  • 0001-11-06 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:arguedateb
  • 7 (xsd:integer)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1950 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, (en)
dbp:concurrence/dissent
  • Black, Douglas (en)
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-02-26 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1951 (xsd:integer)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:holding
  • A court will defer to a federal agency's findings of fact if supported by "substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole." (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Vinson, Reed, Jackson, Burton, Clark, Minton (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Frankfurter (en)
dbp:openjurist
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0 (dbd:second)
dbp:prior
  • 17280.0 (dbd:second)
dbp:uspage
  • 474 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 340 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dct:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474 (1951), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that a court will defer to a federal agency's findings of fact if supported by "substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole." Universal Camera added another qualification to the substantial evidence test laid down in . The evidence supporting the agency's conclusion must be substantial in consideration of the record as a whole, even including the evidence that is not consistent with the agency's conclusion. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Universal Camera Corp. v.National Labor Relations Board (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License