An Entity of Type: Thing, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

United States v. DuBay, 17 C.M.A. 147, 37 C.M.R 411 (C.M.A. 1967), was a United States case decided by the Court of Military Appeals that established procedure in courts-martial for holding hearings to determine issues raised collaterally which require findings of fact and conclusions of law. Such hearings are commonly referred to as "DuBay hearings", and the case is cited in the rules of the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • United States v. DuBay, 17 C.M.A. 147, 37 C.M.R 411 (C.M.A. 1967), was a United States case decided by the Court of Military Appeals that established procedure in courts-martial for holding hearings to determine issues raised collaterally which require findings of fact and conclusions of law. Such hearings are commonly referred to as "DuBay hearings", and the case is cited in the rules of the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The case centered around the commander of Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, and his staff judge advocate. The two disagreed on the role of the president of the court-martial and the military judge. The litigation would grow to encompass over 100 cases. From 1966 to 1968, the DuBay cases were held. One of the cases, a court-martial of a Private DuBay would become the title case of the lawsuit. (en)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 12230645 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 7537 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1104997809 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:citations
  • 17 (xsd:integer)
dbp:court
dbp:dateDecided
  • 1967-07-21 (xsd:date)
dbp:name
  • United States v. DuBay (en)
dbp:sign
  • Army Board of Review (en)
dbp:source
  • United States v. DuBay (en)
dbp:text
  • An examination of the record before us, together with a limited consideration of the affidavits offered by the government, convinces us that the issues are real and warrant a hearing on the matter where sworn testimony can be taken, with each party enjoying the right of cross- examination in matters which are largely subjective in nature and exclusively within the personal knowledge of the respective witnesses. (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdfs:comment
  • United States v. DuBay, 17 C.M.A. 147, 37 C.M.R 411 (C.M.A. 1967), was a United States case decided by the Court of Military Appeals that established procedure in courts-martial for holding hearings to determine issues raised collaterally which require findings of fact and conclusions of law. Such hearings are commonly referred to as "DuBay hearings", and the case is cited in the rules of the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. (en)
rdfs:label
  • United States v. DuBay (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License