An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

United States v. Bell Telephone Co., 167 U.S. 224 (1897), is an 1897 decision of the United States Supreme Court that held that the United States lacked standing to challenge the validity of its issued patents “on the mere ground of error of judgment” in issuing them. The United States had standing to seek to invalidate patents, however, on grounds of fraudulent procurement and also as a defense to a charge of patent infringement. The decision operated for many decades as a bar to government efforts to seek invalidation of patents that it considered spurious until the Supreme Court limited Bell Telephone, first to a limited extent in United States v. United States Gypsum Co., and then more broadly in United States v. Glaxo Group Ltd.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • United States v. Bell Telephone Co., 167 U.S. 224 (1897), is an 1897 decision of the United States Supreme Court that held that the United States lacked standing to challenge the validity of its issued patents “on the mere ground of error of judgment” in issuing them. The United States had standing to seek to invalidate patents, however, on grounds of fraudulent procurement and also as a defense to a charge of patent infringement. The decision operated for many decades as a bar to government efforts to seek invalidation of patents that it considered spurious until the Supreme Court limited Bell Telephone, first to a limited extent in United States v. United States Gypsum Co., and then more broadly in United States v. Glaxo Group Ltd. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 46991416 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 11066 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 925257316 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedatea
  • 0001-11-09 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:arguedateb
  • 11 (xsd:integer)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1896 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • United States v. American Bell Telephone Co., (en)
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-05-10 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1897 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Harlan (en)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • United States of America v. American Bell Telephone Company and Emile Berliner (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:justia
dbp:litigants
  • United States of America v. American Bell Telephone Company (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Brewer (en)
dbp:notparticipating
  • Gray and Brown (en)
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 17 (xsd:integer)
dbp:prior
  • 65 (xsd:integer)
dbp:uspage
  • 224 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 167 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • United States v. Bell Telephone Co., 167 U.S. 224 (1897), is an 1897 decision of the United States Supreme Court that held that the United States lacked standing to challenge the validity of its issued patents “on the mere ground of error of judgment” in issuing them. The United States had standing to seek to invalidate patents, however, on grounds of fraudulent procurement and also as a defense to a charge of patent infringement. The decision operated for many decades as a bar to government efforts to seek invalidation of patents that it considered spurious until the Supreme Court limited Bell Telephone, first to a limited extent in United States v. United States Gypsum Co., and then more broadly in United States v. Glaxo Group Ltd. (en)
rdfs:label
  • United States v. American Bell Telephone Co. (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • United States of America v. American Bell Telephone Company and Emile Berliner (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License