About: Torres v. Madrid

An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Torres v. Madrid, 592 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case based on what constitutes a "seizure" in the context of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, in the immediate case, in the situation where law enforcement had attempted to use physical force to stop a suspect but failed to do so. The Court ruled in a 5–3 decision that the use of physical force with the intent to restrain a person, even if that fails to restrain the person, is considered a seizure.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Torres v. Madrid, 592 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case based on what constitutes a "seizure" in the context of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, in the immediate case, in the situation where law enforcement had attempted to use physical force to stop a suspect but failed to do so. The Court ruled in a 5–3 decision that the use of physical force with the intent to restrain a person, even if that fails to restrain the person, is considered a seizure. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/592/19-292/ https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/18/18-2134.pdf https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6107903/87/torres-v-madrid/ https://www.oyez.org/cases/2020/19-292 https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-292_21p3.pdf
dbo:wikiPageID	64578662 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	10283 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1116506603 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:California_v._Hodari_D. dbr:Samuel_Alito dbr:Brett_Kavanaugh dbr:John_Roberts dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Tenth_Circuit dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_District_of_New_Mexico dbr:United_States_Supreme_Court dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbr:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg dbr:Clarence_Thomas dbr:Elena_Kagan dbr:Stephen_Breyer dbr:COVID-19_pandemic dbr:Amy_Coney_Barrett dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbc:2021_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law dbr:Sonia_Sotomayor dbr:Methamphetamine dbr:Neil_Gorsuch dbr:Certiorari dbr:Qualified_immunity dbr:Search_and_seizure dbr:F._App'x
dbp:arguedate	0001-10-14 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear	2020 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case	Torres v. Madrid, (en)
dbp:decidedate	0001-03-25 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear	2021 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent	Gorsuch (en)
dbp:docket	19 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname	Roxanne Torres v. Janice Madrid, et al. (en)
dbp:holding	The application of physical force to the body of a person with intent to restrain is a seizure even if the person does not submit and is not subdued. (en)
dbp:joindissent	Thomas, Alito (en)
dbp:joinmajority	Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh (en)
dbp:justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/592/19-292/
dbp:lawsapplied	dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
dbp:litigants	Torres v. Madrid (en)
dbp:majority	Roberts (en)
dbp:notparticipating	Barrett (en)
dbp:otherSource	Supreme Court (en)
dbp:otherUrl	https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-292_21p3.pdf
dbp:oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2020/19-292
dbp:prior	Summary judgment granted, Torres v. Madrid, No. 1:16-cv-01163, 2018 WL 4148405 Affirmed, 769 F. App'x 654 *Cert. granted, 140 S. Ct. 680 (en)
dbp:uspage	___ (en)
dbp:usvol	592 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Ussc dbt:US4thAmendment
dcterms:subject	dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbc:2021_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law
rdf:type	owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:comment	Torres v. Madrid, 592 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case based on what constitutes a "seizure" in the context of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, in the immediate case, in the situation where law enforcement had attempted to use physical force to stop a suspect but failed to do so. The Court ruled in a 5–3 decision that the use of physical force with the intent to restrain a person, even if that fails to restrain the person, is considered a seizure. (en)
rdfs:label	Torres v. Madrid (en)
owl:sameAs	wikidata:Torres v. Madrid https://global.dbpedia.org/id/E1u1u
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Torres_v._Madrid?oldid=1116506603&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Torres_v._Madrid
foaf:name	Roxanne Torres v. Janice Madrid, et al. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:Torres_v_Madrid
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:California_v._Hodari_D. dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Torres_v_Madrid
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Torres_v._Madrid