About: Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States

An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States, 345 U.S. 594 (1953), is an antitrust law decision by the United States Supreme Court. In a 5–4 decision it held that a tie-in sale of morning and evening newspaper advertising space does not violate the Sherman Antitrust Act, because there was no market dominance in the tying product.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States, 345 U.S. 594 (1953), is an antitrust law decision by the United States Supreme Court. In a 5–4 decision it held that a tie-in sale of morning and evening newspaper advertising space does not violate the Sherman Antitrust Act, because there was no market dominance in the tying product. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/105/670/1975579/ http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep345/usrep345594/usrep345594.pdf https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/345/594.html https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=15440149332781428417 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/345/594/case.html https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/105131/times-picayune-publishing-co-v-united-states/
dbo:wikiPageID	31636872 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	3186 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	927333159 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_345 dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Eastern_District_of_Louisiana dbr:United_States_Supreme_Court dbr:United_States_v._Loew's_Inc. dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Vinson_Court dbc:United_States_antitrust_case_law dbr:Tie-in dbc:Business_ethics_cases dbc:1953_in_United_States_case_law dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Yale_Law_Journal dbr:Sherman_Antitrust_Act dbr:Stanford_Law_Review dbr:Product_bundling dbr:Jefferson_Parish_Hospital_Dist._No._2_v._Hyde dbr:Antitrust_law dbr:Sherman_Act dbr:F._Supp. dbr:U.S._LEXIS
dbp:arguedate	0001-03-11 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear	1953 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case	Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States, (en)
dbp:courtlistener	https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/105131/times-picayune-publishing-co-v-united-states/
dbp:decidedate	0001-05-24 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear	1953 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent	Burton (en)
dbp:findlaw	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/345/594.html
dbp:fullname	Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States (en)
dbp:googlescholar	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=15440149332781428417
dbp:holding	A publisher selling only combined insertions appearing in both its morning and evening papers does not violate the Sherman Act (en)
dbp:joindissent	Black, Douglas, Minton (en)
dbp:joinmajority	Vinson, Reed, Frankfurter, Jackson (en)
dbp:justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/345/594/case.html
dbp:lawsapplied	dbr:Sherman_Antitrust_Act
dbp:litigants	Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States (en)
dbp:loc	http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep345/usrep345594/usrep345594.pdf
dbp:majority	Clark (en)
dbp:parallelcitations	172800.0
dbp:prior	105 (xsd:integer)
dbp:uspage	594 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol	345 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:SCOTUS-case-stub dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Cite_journal dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Ussc
dcterms:subject	dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Vinson_Court dbc:United_States_antitrust_case_law dbc:Business_ethics_cases dbc:1953_in_United_States_case_law
rdf:type	owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 yago:WikicatBusinessEthicsCases yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:comment	Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States, 345 U.S. 594 (1953), is an antitrust law decision by the United States Supreme Court. In a 5–4 decision it held that a tie-in sale of morning and evening newspaper advertising space does not violate the Sherman Antitrust Act, because there was no market dominance in the tying product. (en)
rdfs:label	Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States (en)
owl:sameAs	freebase:Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States yago-res:Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States wikidata:Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4wJdn
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Times-Picayune_Publishing_Co._v._United_States?oldid=927333159&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Times-Picayune_Publishing_Co._v._United_States
foaf:name	(en) Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:345_U.S._594 dbr:Times-Picayune_Publishing_Co._v_United_States dbr:Times-Picayune_Publishing_Co._v._US dbr:Times-Picayune_v._US
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:United_States_antitrust_law dbr:Lorain_Journal_Co._v._United_States dbr:345_U.S._594 dbr:Harold_Hitz_Burton dbr:Times-Picayune_Publishing_Co._v_United_States dbr:Times-Picayune_Publishing_Co._v._US dbr:Times-Picayune_v._US
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Times-Picayune_Publishing_Co._v._United_States