| dbo:abstract
|
- Students for Fair Admissions, INC. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College (Harvard Corporation) ist ein in den Vereinigten Staaten von großem Medieninteresse begleiteter, am Bezirksgericht für den Justizbezirk von Massachusetts in den Jahren 2018 und 2019 verhandelter Fall zur Frage, ob die Harvard University durch ihre Zulassungspraktiken aufgrund der Berücksichtigung der ethnischen Zugehörigkeit in unrechtmäßiger Art und Weise asiatischstämmige Bewerber diskriminiert. (de)
- Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College (Docket 20–1199) and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina (Docket 21-707) are a pair of lawsuits concerning racial discrimination in affirmative action programs in college admissions processes. The first case involves Harvard University's undergraduate admissions process which is claimed to discriminate against Asian American applicants, while the second centers on the University of North Carolina's use of socioeconomic factors in administration, which is claimed to incorporate race and violate Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Both cases seek review of the Supreme Court decision Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) which validated the use of affirmative action programs in college admissions as long as race is not used as the sole deciding factor. The cases were originally certified and consolidated under the Harvard case in January 2022, but following the appointment of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who is a member of the Harvard Board of Overseers, the cases were split with Jackson abstaining from the Harvard case while participating in the North Carolina one. (en)
- 學生公平錄取組織訴哈佛大學的校長與教職員案（英語：Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College，案卷第20-1199號）是（以下简称“SFFA”）和其他原告于2014年在马萨诸塞州（“麻省”）的美国联邦地方法院对哈佛大学提起的诉讼。原告称哈佛在本科生录取过程中歧视亚裔美国申请人。 2019年10月1日， 艾莉森·戴尔·巴勒斯法官驳回了原告的主张，裁定哈佛的招生惯例符合宪法要求，且并没有不正当地歧视亚裔。 2020年2月，SFFA向第一巡回上诉法院提出上诉但被駁回。2021年2月下旬，SFFA向美国最高法院提出上訴。 2021年12月8日，拜登政府要求最高法院駁回學生組織指控哈佛大學案。2022年1月24日，学生公平录取组织诉北卡罗来纳大学案（案卷号第21-707号）被合并入本案（案卷号第20-1199号），最高法院同意一并受理，其中哈佛大学为私立大学，北卡罗来纳大学为公立大学。2022年7月22日，诉哈佛案和诉北卡案分拆。2022年10月31日，两案在最高法院开始审理。11月1日，最高法院就哈佛大學案展开辩论。 (zh)
|
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 39427 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-10-31 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:docket
|
- 20 (xsd:integer)
- 21 (xsd:integer)
|
| dbp:fullname
|
- Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College (en)
- Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina, et al. (en)
|
| dbp:lawsapplied
| |
| dbp:litigants
|
- Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina (en)
- Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College (en)
|
| dbp:oralargument
| |
| dbp:prior
| |
| dbp:questionspresented
|
- 1 (xsd:integer)
- 2 (xsd:integer)
- Should this Court overrule Grutter v. Bollinger, and hold that institutions of higher education cannot use race as a factor in admissions; and (en)
- Title VI of the Civil Rights Act bans race-based admissions that, if done by a public university, would violate the Equal Protection Clause. Is Harvard violating Title VI by penalizing Asian-American applicants, engaging in racial balancing, overemphasizing race, and rejecting workable race-neutral alternatives? (en)
|
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Students for Fair Admissions, INC. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College (Harvard Corporation) ist ein in den Vereinigten Staaten von großem Medieninteresse begleiteter, am Bezirksgericht für den Justizbezirk von Massachusetts in den Jahren 2018 und 2019 verhandelter Fall zur Frage, ob die Harvard University durch ihre Zulassungspraktiken aufgrund der Berücksichtigung der ethnischen Zugehörigkeit in unrechtmäßiger Art und Weise asiatischstämmige Bewerber diskriminiert. (de)
- 學生公平錄取組織訴哈佛大學的校長與教職員案（英語：Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College，案卷第20-1199號）是（以下简称“SFFA”）和其他原告于2014年在马萨诸塞州（“麻省”）的美国联邦地方法院对哈佛大学提起的诉讼。原告称哈佛在本科生录取过程中歧视亚裔美国申请人。 2019年10月1日， 艾莉森·戴尔·巴勒斯法官驳回了原告的主张，裁定哈佛的招生惯例符合宪法要求，且并没有不正当地歧视亚裔。 2020年2月，SFFA向第一巡回上诉法院提出上诉但被駁回。2021年2月下旬，SFFA向美国最高法院提出上訴。 2021年12月8日，拜登政府要求最高法院駁回學生組織指控哈佛大學案。2022年1月24日，学生公平录取组织诉北卡罗来纳大学案（案卷号第21-707号）被合并入本案（案卷号第20-1199号），最高法院同意一并受理，其中哈佛大学为私立大学，北卡罗来纳大学为公立大学。2022年7月22日，诉哈佛案和诉北卡案分拆。2022年10月31日，两案在最高法院开始审理。11月1日，最高法院就哈佛大學案展开辩论。 (zh)
- Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College (Docket 20–1199) and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina (Docket 21-707) are a pair of lawsuits concerning racial discrimination in affirmative action programs in college admissions processes. The first case involves Harvard University's undergraduate admissions process which is claimed to discriminate against Asian American applicants, while the second centers on the University of North Carolina's use of socioeconomic factors in administration, which is claimed to incorporate race and violate Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Both cases seek review of the Supreme Court decision Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) which validated the use of affirmative action programs in college ad (en)
|
| rdfs:label
|
- Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard (de)
- Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College (en)
- 學生公平錄取組織訴哈佛大學的校長與教職員案 (zh)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College (en)
- Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina, et al. (en)
|
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
